Surgical procedures associated with risk of ovarian cancer

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 710-715

  Kreiger, Nancy ^a   Sloan, Margaret ^a   Cotterchio, Michelle ^b   Parsons, Phil ^a  

^a CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cohort study; Epidemiology; Hysterectomy; Ovarian cancer; Tubal ligation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVARIECTOMY; OVARY CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN DISEASES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; OVARIECTOMY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STERILIZATION, TUBAL;

EID: 0030752209     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.4.710     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Irwin K L, Weiss N S, Lee N C, Peterson H B. Tubal sterilization, hysterectomy, und the subsequent occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 362-69.
2. Booth M, Beral V, Smith P. Risk factors for ovarian cancer; A case-control study. Br J Cancer 1989; 60: 592-98.
3. Whittemore A S, Wu M L, Paffenbarger R S et al. Personal and environmental characteristics related to epithelial ovarian cancer: II. Exposures to talcum powder, tobacco, alcohol, and coffee. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128: 1228-40.
4. Parazzini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Luchini L, Mezzopane R. Hysterectomy, oophorectomy. and subsequent ovarian cancer risk. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 363-66.
5. Hankinson S E, Hunter D J, Colditz G A et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer: A prospective study. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 2813-18.
6. Weiss N S, Harlow B L. Why does hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy influence the subsequent incidence of ovarian cancer? Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 856-58.
7. Statistics Canada, Health Division, Nosology Reference Centre. Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Surgical Procedures (CCSP). Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, 1986, Catalogue 82-562E; 8-2301-507.
8. Jaro M. AUTOMATCH. Silver Springs, MD: Match Ware Technologies, Inc., 1993.
9. Coleman M P, Hermon C, Douglas A. Person-Years (PYRS): A FORTRAN program for cohort study analysis. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1989.
10. Annegers J F, Strom H, Decker D G, Dockerty M B. O'Fallon W M. Ovarian cancer: incidence and case-control study. Cancer 1979; 43: 723-29.
11. Whittemore A S. Harris R, Itnyre J, and the Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: Collaborative analysis of 12 case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 1184-203.
12. Mori M, Harabuchi I, Miyake H, Casagrande J T, Henderson B E, Ross R K. Reproductive, genetic, and dietary risk factors for ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128: 771-77.
13. Koch M, Starreveld A A, Hill G B, Jenkins H. The effect of tubal ligation on the incidence of epithelial cancer of the ovary. Cancer Detection Prevention 1984; 7: 241-45.
14. Myers E R. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer (letter). J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271: 1235.
15. The Daily. Statistics Canada, 1993 May 11:8, Catalogue 11-001E.