Integration of a sensory component into the accommodation model reveals differences between emmetropia and late-onset myopia

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1511-1516

  Jiang, Bai Chuan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Late onset myopia; Model; Myopia; Sensory

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MYOPIA; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGE OF ONSET; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOPIA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 0030750195     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Owens DA. Near work, accommodative tonus, and myopia. In: Grosvenor T, Flom MC, eds. Refractive Anomalies, Research and Clinical Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991:318-344.
2. Goldschmidt E. On the etiology of myopia. An epidemiological study. Acta Ophthalmol. 1968;(suppl):98.
3. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:997-1004.
4. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Effect of a near-vision task on the response AC/A of a myopic population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7:225-233.
5. Woung L, Ukai K, Tsuchiay K, Ishikawa S. Accommodative adaptation and age of onset of myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:366-370.
6. Strang NC, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Repeatability of post-task regression of accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:88-91.
7. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Differences in adaptation of tonic accommodation with refractive state. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:460-469.
8. Gilmartin B, Bullimore MA. Adaptation of tonic accommodation to sustained visual tasks in emmetropia and late onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:22-26.
9. Ramsdale C. The effect of ammetropia on the accommodative response. Acta Ophthalmol. 1985;63:167-174.
10. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6:145-149.
11. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B, Royston JM. Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80:143-155.
12. Goss DA, Zhai H. Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error: A literature review. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;86:349-380.
13. Stark L, Takahashi Y, Zames G. Nonlinear servoanalysis of human lens accommodation. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern. 1965;(SSC)1:75-83.
14. Toates FM. Accommodation function of the human eye. Physiol Rev. 1972;52:828-863.
15. Hung GK, Semmlow JL. Static behavior of accommodation and vergence: Computer simulation of an interactive dual-feedback system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;27:439-447.
16. Ripps H, Chin NB, Siegel IM, Breinin GM. The effect of pupil size on accommodation, convergence, and the AC/A ratio. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1962;1:127-135.
17. Hennessy RT, Iida T, Shina K, Leibowitz HW. The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Res. 1976;16:587-589.
18. Ward PA, Charman WN. Effect of pupil size on steady-state accommodation. Vision Res. 1985;25:1317-1326.
19. Johnson CA. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J Opt Soc Am. 1976;66:138-142.
20. Heath GG. The influence of visual acuity on accom- modative responses of the eye. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1956;33:513-524.
21. Owens DA. A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings. Vision Res. 1980;20:159-167.
22. Ciuffreda KJ, Hokoda SC. Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes. Vision Res. 1983;23:1585-1594.
23. Ciuffreda KJ, Rumpf D. Contrast and accommodation in amblyopia. Vision Res. 1985;25:1445-1457.
24. Gallagher JT, Citek K. A Badal optical stimulator for the Canon Autoref R-1 optometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:276-278.
25. Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J, Howland HC. Developing eyes that lack accommodation growth to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci. 1990;4:177-183.
26. Hung LF, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat Med. 1995;1:761-765.
27. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690-694.
28. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 1995;35:1299-1304.
29. Jiang B. Parameters of accommodative and vergence systems and the development of late-onset myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1737-1742.