Revision of the cerrado hemicryptophytic Chamaesyce of Boissier's 'Pleiadeniae'(Euphorbiaceae)

Brittonia

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 155-180

  Simmons, Mark P ^a,b   Hayden, W John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerrado; Chamaesyce; Euphorbia; Euphorbiaceae

Indexed keywords

CHAMAESYCE; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE;

EID: 0030738867     PISSN: 0007196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2807678     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, E. N. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic terms. Syst. Zool. 21: 390-397.
2. Allem, A. C. 1977. Notas sistemáticas y nuevos sinónimos en Euphorbiaceae de América del Sur -V. Revista Brasil. Biol. 37: 223-231.
3. _ & B. E. Irgang. 1975. Flora illustrada do Rio Grande do Sul: Euphorbiaceae Tribo Euphorbieae. Bol. Inst. Cent. Biociências, Sér. Bot. 4, 34: 1-97.
4. Benedí, C. & J. J. Orell. 1992. Taxonomy of the genus Chamaesyce S. F. Gray (Euphorbiaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 21: 9-55.
5. Boissier, E. 1860. Centuria Euphorbiarum. Pages 1-40. Paris.
6. _. 1862. Subordo Euphorbieae. In: De Candolle, Prodromus 15(2): 3-188. Paris.
7. _. 1866. Icones Euphorbiarum. 1-24., 1-120 fig., Paris.
8. Bremer, K. 1990. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics 6: 369-372.
9. Chodat, R. 1901. Plantae Hasslerianae soil énumération des plantes récoltées au Paraguay par le Dr. Émile Hassler, d'Aarau (Suisse) de 1885-1895 et de 1898-1900. Euphorbiaceae. Bull. Herb. Boissier, sér. 2, 1: 395-400.
10. _ & E. Hassler. 1905. Euphorbia. In: Plantae Hasslerianae. Bull. Herb. Boissier, sér. 2, 5: 613-616.
11. Croizat, L. 1943. Novelties in American Euphorbiaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 24: 165-189.
12. Emrich, K. 1937. Uma nova Euphorbia dos campos do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Sudamer. Bot. 4: 83-85.
13. Farris, J. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
14. _. 1988. Hennig86 version 1.5. Computer program and documentation. Distributed by the author.
15. _. 1991. Eve version 1.1. Computer program. Distributed by the author.
16. Goloboff, P. A. 1993a. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 38-91.
17. _. 1993b. Pee-Wee version 2.1. Computer software and documentation. Distributed by the author.
18. Haber, J. M. 1925. The anatomy and morphology of the flower of Euphorbia. Ann. Bot. 39: 657-707.
19. Hayden, W. J. 1988. Ontogeny of the cotyledonary region of Chamaesyce maculata (Euphorbiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1701-1713.
20. Huft, M. J. 1979. A monograph of Euphorbia section Tithymalopsis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
21. Hurusawa, I. 1954. Eine nochmalige Durchsicht des herkömlichen Systems der Euphorbiaceen im weiteren Sinne. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 6: 209-342.
22. Jordan, M. S. & W. J. Hayden. 1992. A survey of mucilaginous testa in Chamaesyce. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 21: 79-89.
23. Klotzsch, F. 1859. Linnés natürliche Pflanzenklasse Tricoccae. Abh. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. 1: 1-108.
24. Koutnik, D. L. 1984. Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) - a newly recognized genus in southern Africa. South African J. Bot. 3: 262-264.
25. _. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the Hawaiian species of the genus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae). Allertonia 4(6): 331-388.
26. Lin, S., S. Chaw, & C. Hsieh. 1991. A taxonomic study of the genus Chamaesyce S. F. Gray (Euphorbiaceae) in Taiwan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 32: 215-251.
27. López, C. & M. J. Diez. 1985. Contribución al atlas palinológico de Andalucía occidental, III Euphorbiaceae. Lagascalia 13: 275-291.
28. Mueller, J. (Mueller Argoviensis). 1874. Euphorbiaceae. In: C. F. P. Martius. Flora Brasiliensis 11(2): 293-750. Munich.
29. Nixon, K. C. 1993. ClaDOS version 1.4. Computer program and documentation. Distributed by the author.
30. _ & Q. D. Wheeler. 1990. Extinction and the origin of species. Pages 119-143. In: M. J. Novak & Q. D. Wheeler (editors). Extinction and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.
31. Punt, W. 1962. Pollen morphology of the Euphorbiaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Wentia 7: 1-116.
32. Rambo, B. 1960. Euphorbiaceae Riograndenses. Pesquisas 9: 1-78.
33. Schoute, J. C. 1937. On the aestivation in the cyathium of Euphorbia fulgens, with some general remarks on the morphological interpretation of the cyathium in general. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neérl. 34: 168-181.
34. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Taxonomic congruence in the Leptopodomorpha re-examined. Syst. Zool. 30: 309-325.
35. Subils, R. 1977. Las especies de Euphorbia de la República Argentina. Kurtziana 10: 83-248.
36. Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Webster, G. L. 1967. The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 48: 303-430.
38. _. 1994. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 33-144.
39. _, W. V. Brown & B. N. Smith. 1975. Systematics of photosynthetic carbon fixation pathways in Euphorbia. Taxon 24: 27-33.
40. _, E. Rupert & D. Koutnik. 1982. Systematic significance of pollen nuclear number in Euphorbiaceae, tribe Euphorbieae. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 407-415.