A critique of the case for privatizing social security

Gerontologist

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 561-571

  Williamson, John B ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Entitlements; Inequity; Pensions; Policy; Privatization

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; ECONOMICS; GOVERNMENT; PENSION; RETIREMENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL SECURITY; TAX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030731384     PISSN: 00169013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geront/37.5.561     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Advisory Council on Social Security. (1997). Report of the 1994-1996 Advisory Council on Social Security. Volume 1: Findings and Recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2. American Academy of Actuaries. (1996). Social Security privatization: Individual accounts. Issue Brief, Spring, 1-4.
3. Baker, D. (1997). The privateers' free lunch. American Prospect, May/June, 81-84
4. Ball, R. M., & Bethell, T. N. (1997). Bridging the centuries: The case for traditional Social Security. In E. R. Kingson & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social Security in the 21st century (pp. 259-294). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beard, S. (1996). Restoring hope in America: The Social Security solution. San Francisco: ICS Press.
6. Bipartison Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform. (1995). Bipartison Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Borden, K. (1995). Dismantling the pyramid: The why and how of privatizing Social Security. (The Cato Project on Social Security Privatization, SSP. No. 1.) Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
8. Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds. (1996). 1996 annual report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Bosworth, B. (1995). Putting Social Security to work: How to restore the balance between generations. Brookings Review, 13(4), 36-39.
10. Burkhauser, R., & Warlick. J. (1981). Disentangling the annuity from the redistributive aspects of Social Security. Review of Income and Wealth, 27, 401-421.
11. Chen, Y. P. (1995). The key issues in the privatization debate. In K. Stephenson (Ed.), Social Security: Time for a change (pp. 193-203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Chen, Y. P., & Goss, S. C. (1997). Are returns on payroll taxes fair? In E. R. Kingson & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social Security in the 21st century (pp. 76-90). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Council of Economic Advisors. (1996). Economic report of the President Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Diamond, P. A. (1996). Proposals to restructure Social Security. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 67-88.
15. Eisner, R. (1994). The misunderstood economy: What counts and how to count it. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Eisner, R. (1995). Savings, economic growth, and the arrow of causality. Challenge, 38(3), 10-14.
17. Ferrara, P. J. (1985). Social Security and the super IRA: A populist proposal. In P. Ferrara (Ed.), Social Security: Prospects for real reform (pp. 193-220). Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
18. Ferrara, P. J. (1990) Social Security and the private sector. National Forum, 70(1), 32-33.
19. Ferrara, P. J. (1995). A private option for Social Security. In K. Stephenson (Ed.), Social Security: Time for a change (pp. 205-213). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20. Friedland, R. B. (1994). When support and confidence are at odds: The public's understanding of the Social Security program. Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance.
21. Friedland, R. B.(1996). Privatizing social insurance. Public Policy and Aging Report, 7 (June), 11-15.
22. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. International Labour Office. (1992). The cost of social security: Thirteenth international inquiry, 1984-1986. Geneva: International Labour Office.
24. International Labour Office. (1994). World labour report 1994. Geneva: International Labour Office.
25. Kingson, E. R. (1988). Generational equity: An unexpected opportunity to broaden the politics of aging. The Gerontologist, 28, 765-772.
26. Kritzer, B. E. (1996). Privatizing Social Security: The Chilean experience. Social Security Bulletin, 59(3), 45-55.
27. Mitchell, O. S., & Zeldes, S. P. (1996, January) Social Security privatization: A structure for analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, San Francisco, CA.
28. Munnell, A., & Ernsberger, N. (1990). Foreign experience with public pen- sion surpluses and national savings. In C. L. Weaver (Ed.), Social Security's looming surpluses, prospects and implications (pp. 85-118). Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.
29. Myers, R. J. (1992). Chile's social security reform, after ten years. Benefits Quarterly, 8(3), 41-55.
30. Perez, R. C. (1995). No way to run a railroad: Social Security funds should invest in common stocks! In K. Stephenson (Ed.), Social Security: Time for a change (pp. 177-190). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31. Peterson, P. G. (1993). Facing up: How to rescue the economy from crushing debt and restore the American dream. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32. Peterson, P. G. (1996). Will America grow up before it grows old? The Atlantic Monthly, May, 55-86.
33. Poortvliet, W. G., & Laine, T. P. (1995). A global trend: Privatization and reform of social security pension plans. Benefits Quarterly, 11(3), 63-84.
34. Porter, J. E. (1995). Individual Social Security retirement accounts. In K. Stephenson (Ed.), Social Security: Time for a change (pp. 197-203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35. Quadagno, J. (1996). Social Security and the myth of the entitlement "crisis." The Gerontologist, 36, 391-399.
36. Quinn, J. F. (1996). Entitlements and the federal budget: Securing our future. Washington, DC: National Academy on Aging.
37. Quinn, J. F., & Mitchell, O. S. (1996). Social Security on the table. American Prospect, May/June, 76-81.
38. Reno, V. P., & Friedland, R. B. (1997). Strong support but low confidence: What explains the contradiction? In E. R. Kingson & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social Security in the 21st century (pp. 178-194). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Ross, S. G. (1997). Institutional and administrative issues. In E. R. Kingson and J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social Security in the 21st century (pp. 231-238). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Schieber, S. (1996). A new vision for Social Security. Public Policy and Aging Report, 7 (June), 1, 6-7, 9.
41. Stephenson, K., Horlacher, D., & Colander, D. (1995). An overview of the U.S. Social Security system: Problems and options. In K. Stephenson (Ed.), Social Security: Time for a change (pp. 3-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42. Steuerle, C. E., & Bakija, J. M. (1994). Retooling Social Security for the 21st century: Right and wrong approaches to reform. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
43. U.S. Senate. (1995). Privatization of the Social Security Old Age and Survivors Insurance Program (Hearing before the Subcommittee on Social Security and Family Protection of the Committee on Finance, 104th Congress, 1st session on S. 824, August 2nd). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44. Whelehan, B. M. (1996). Taking stock of Social Security. Mutual Funds, May, 27-29.
45. White, L. J. (1996). Investing the assets of the Social Security trust funds in equity securities: An analysis. Perspective, 2(4), 1-20. Washington, DC: Investment Company Institute.
46. Williamson, J. B. (1997). Should women support the privatization of Social Security? Challenge, 40(4), 97-108.