In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 117, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 897-902

  Van den Hoogen, F J A ^a   Veenstra, A ^b   Verkerke, G J ^b   Schutte, H K ^b   Manni, J J ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic characteristics; In vivo measurements; Laryngectomy; Nijdam voice prosthesis; Voice rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVICE; ESOPHAGUS MUCOSA; IN VIVO STUDY; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX PROSTHESIS; PHONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SPEECH REHABILITATION; VOICE;

EID: 0030726812     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489709114221     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Singer MI, Blom ED, Hamaker RC. Further experience with voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 498-502.
2. Manni JJ, van den Broek P, de Groot MAH. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Groningen prosthesis. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13: 333-6.
3. Hilgers FJM, Balm AJM. Long term results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the low-resistance, indwelling Provox voice prosthesis system. Clin Otolaryngol 1993; 18: 517-23.
4. Blom ED, Singer MI. Surgical-prosthetic approaches for postlaryngectomy voice restoration. In: Keith RL, Darly FL, eds. Laryngectomee rehabilitation. Houston, TX: College-Hill Press, 1979: 251-76
5. Panje WR. Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy. The voice button. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 116-20.
6. Nijdam HF, Annyas AA, Schutte HK, Leever H. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 237: 27-33.
7. Hilgers FJM, Schouwenburg PF. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 1020-7.
8. Smith BE. Aerodynamic characteristics of Blom-Singer low-pressure voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 1986; 112: 50-2.
9. Zijlstra RJ, Mahieu HF, van Lith-Bijl JT, Schutte HK. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 657-61.
10. Hilgers FJM, Cornelissen MW, Balm AJM. Aerodynamic charactheristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prothesis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1993; 250: 375-8.
11. Van den Hoogen FJA, Nijdam HF, Veenstra A, Manni JJ. The Nijdam voice prosthesis. A self-retaining valve-less voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 913-7.
12. Van den Hoogen FJA, Oudes M, Nijdam HF, Manni JJ. The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: A prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 119-24.
13. Van den Hoogen FJA, van den Berg RJH, Oudes MJ, Manni JJ. A prospective study of speech and voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the low-resistance Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses. J Speech Hear Res (submitted).
14. Veenstra A, van den Hoogen FJA, Verkerke B, Schutte H, Nijdam HF, Manni JJ. Aerodynamics characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to the tracheo-esophageal wall thickness. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1997; 254: 1-5.
15. Verkerke GJ, de Vries MP, Schutte HK, van den Hoogen FJA, Rakhorst G. Finite element study of the Nijdam voice prosthesis. In: Algaba J, ed. Surgery and prosthetic voice restoration after total and subtotal laryngectomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996; 199-201.