A comparison of pollen recovery by three models of the Rotorod Sampler

Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 256-258

  Frenz, David A ^a   Lince, Naomi L ^a,b  

^a Multidata Inc   (United States)

^b MACALESTER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR SAMPLING; ARTICLE; DEVICE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030726714     PISSN: 10811206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63011-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Magill PL, Lumpkins ED, Arveson JS. A system for appraising airborne populations of pollens and spores. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1968;29:293-8.
2. Grinnell SW, Perkins WA, Vaughan LM. Sampling apparatus and method. Patent no. 2,973,642. Washington: United States Patent Office, 1961.
3. Segale JD, ed. Aeroallergen monitoring network: pollen and spore report 1994. Milwaukee: American Academy of Allergy and Immunology, 1995.
4. Batchelder GL. Sampling characteristics of the Rotorod, Rotoslide and Anderson machines for atmospheric pollen and spores. Ann Allergy 1977;39:18-27.
5. Solomon WR, Burge HA, Boise JR, Becker M. Comparative particle recoveries by the retracting Rotorod, Rotoslide and Burkard spore trap sampling in a compact array. Int J Biometeor 1980;24:107-16.
6. Frenz DA, Elander JC. A calibration program for Rotorod samplers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1996;76:245-6.
7. Brown T, Frenz DA, Wimpsett TL, et al. Operating instructions for the Rotorod sampler. Minnetonka, MN: Sampling Technologies, Inc., 1993.
8. Gay LN, Curtis H, Norris T. A pollen survey of the island of Bermuda. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1941;68:179-89.
9. Frenz DA, Scamehorn RT, Hokanson JM, Murray LW. A brief method for analyzing Rotorod samples for pollen content. Aerobiologia 1996;12:51-4.
10. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.
11. Burge HA. Monitoring for airborne allergens, Ann Allergy 1992;69:9-18.