Test-retest variability in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions obtained from special care nursery neonates

Australian Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 557-560

  Smyth, Veronica ^a   McPherson, Bradley ^a   Young, June ^b   Tudenhope, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b MATER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0030711529     PISSN: 10372105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. BROWNELL W.E. (1990) Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11, 82-92.
2. HARRIS F.P., PROBST R., WENGER R. (1991) Repeatability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing humans. Audiology 30,135-141.
3. KEMP D.T. (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386-1391.
4. KEMP D.T., RYAN S., BRAY P. (1990) A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 11, 93-127.
5. MARSHALL L., HELLER L.H. (1996) Reliability of transientevoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 17, 237-254.
6. SMYTH V., O'CONNELL B., SCOTT J., TUDEHOPE D., LEWIS B., LEWIS A.N. (1986) Auditory brain stem evoked response variability in clinical paediatric audiology. Part 1: Age and sex interaction effects in normal neonates and infants. Aust. J. Audiol. 8, 1-10.