Feature selection and classifiers for the computerized detection of mass lesions in digital mammography

IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks - Conference Proceedings

Volumn 4, Issue , 1997, Pages 2460-2463

  Kupinski, Matthew A ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFIERS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; INDIVIDUAL FEATURES; LINEAR DISCRIMINANTS; MASS LESION;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MAMMOGRAPHY; X RAY SCREENS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; FEATURE EXTRACTION; NEURAL NETWORKS;

NEURAL NETWORKS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030707020     PISSN: 10987576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICNN.1997.614543     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. M. L. Giger. Computer-aided diagnosis. RSNA Categorical Course in Physics, pages 283-298, 1993.
2. D. E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, 1989.
3. R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1992.
4. N. Karssemeijer and G. M. te Brake. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 15(5):611-619, 1996.
5. M. Kupinski, M. L. Giger, P. Lu, and Z. Huo. Computerized detection of mammographic lesions: Performance of artificial neural netowkr with enhanced feature extraction. In SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 2434, pages 598-605, 1995.
6. J. Y. Lo, J. A. Baker, P. J. Kornguth, and J. C. E. Floyd. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. Academic Radiology, 2:841-850, 1995.
7. C. E. Metz. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, VIII(4):283-298, 1978.
8. C. E. Metz. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Investigative Radiology, 21, 1986.
9. C. E. Metz and J.-H. Shen. Gains in accuracy from replicated readings of diagnostic images: Prediction and assessment in terms of ROC analysis. Medical Decision Making, 12:60-75, 1992.
10. N. Petrick, H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, and D. Wei. An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 15(l):59-67, 1996.
11. P. Sutton and S. Boyden. Genetic algorithms: A general search procedure. American Journal of Physics, 62(6):549-552, 1994.
12. E. L. Thurfjell, K. A. Lernevall, and A. A. Taube. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology, 191:241-244, 1994.
13. D. Wei, H.-P. Chan, M. A. Helvie, B. Sahiner, N. Petrick, D. D. Adler, and M. M. Goodsitt. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: Multiresolution texture analysis. Medical Physics, 22(9):1501-1513, 1995.
14. Y. Wu, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. E. Metz, R. M. Nishikawa, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Schmidt. Application of artificial neural networks in mammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer. In SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 1778, pages 19-27, 1992.
15. F.-F. Yin, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. E. Metz, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Schmidt. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilteral subtraction images. Medical Physics, 18(5):955-963, 1991.
16. M. Zhang and M. Giger. Automated detection of spiculated lesions and architectural distortions in dig-itezed mammograms. In SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 2434, pages 846-854, 1995.