Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: The study

Laryngoscope

Volumn 107, Issue 12 II SUPPL., 1997, Pages 26-36

  Rizer, Franklin M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; EARDRUM PERFORATION; FEMALE; HEALING; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYRINGOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYMPANOPLASTY;

EID: 0030702798     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199712001-00002     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Doyle JP, Schleuning AJ, Echevarria J. Tympanoplasty: Should grafts be placed medial or lateral to the tympanic membrane? Laryngoscope 1992;82;1425-30.
2. Glasscock ME III. Tympanic membrane grafting with fascia: overlay vs. undersurface technique. Laryngoscope 1973;83; 754-70.
3. Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty: a review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89:331-4.