Environmental turbulence staff nurse perspectives

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 15-22

  Tillman, Hany J ^a,b,c   Salyer, Jeanne ^a   Corley, Maty C ^b   Mark, Barbara A ^b  

^a Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United States)

^b Department of Adult Health Nursing ^*  (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; STAFF;

ADULT; HEALTH FACILITY ENVIRONMENT; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; JOB SATISFACTION; MID-ATLANTIC REGION; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING SERVICE, HOSPITAL; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PERSONNEL STAFFING AND SCHEDULING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0030700391     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-199711000-00005     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. Organization and Environment. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University; 1907:23-108.
2. Blumberg M, Pringle CD. The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Acad Manage Review. 1982;7(4):560-569.
3. Dachler HP, Mobley WH. Construct validation of an instrumentality-expectancy-task goal model of work motivation. J Applied Psychol Monograph. 1973;5S(3):397-418.
4. Mitchell TF. The effects of social, task, and situational factors on motivation, performance, and appraisal. In: Landy F, Zideck S, Cleveland J, eds. Performance Measurement and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983:39-59.
5. Peters LH, O'Connor FJ. Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influences of a frequently overlooked construct. Acad Manage Review. 1980;5(3):391-397.
6. Shukla RK. The theory of support systems and nursing performance. In: Lewis EM, Spicer JG, eds. Human Resource Management Handbook for Nurse Managers. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987:35-52.
7. Duncan RL. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Adm Sci Q. 1972;17(3):313-327.
8. Lawrence P, Dyer D. Renewing American Indnsliy. New York, NT: Free Press, 1983.
9. Mintzberg H. Structure in Fires: Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983:135-145
10. Alexander JW, Randolph \\'A. Hie fit between technology and stnicture as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. Acad Manage J. 1985;28(4):844-859.
11. Alexander JW, Bauerschmidt AD. Implications for nursing administration of die relationship of technology and structure to quality of care. Nurs Adm Q. 1987;11(4):1-10.
12. Alexander JW, Mark B. Technology and stnicture of nursing organizations. Nurs bealtbcare. 1990;11(-4):195-199.
13. Leatt P, Schneck R. Technology, size, environment, and structure in nursing subunits. O;g Studies. 1982;3(3):221-242.
14. Mark BA. Task and structural correlates of organizational effectiveness in private psychiatric hospitals. Health Seiv Kes. 1985;2(X2):199-244.
15. Overton P, Schneck R, Hazlett CB. An empirical study of the technology of nursing subunits. Adln Sci Q. 1977;22(2):203-219.
16. Verran JA, Reid PJ. Replicated testing of the nursing technology model. Nurs Res. 1987;38(3):190-194.
17. Salyer J. Environmental turbulence: Impact on nurse performance. J Nurs Adm. 1995;25(4);12-20.
18. Huber GP, Daft RL. The information environments of organizations. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts H, Porter LW. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary I'erspcctiiv. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1987:130-164
19. Lincoln YS, Cuba EG. Xatimtlistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
20. Walker R. Applied Qualitative Research. London: Gower; 1985.
21. Sovie MD. Tailoring hospitals for managed care and integrated health systems. Nurs Econ. 1995;13(2):72-83.
22. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Knaus \VA, Duffy J. The performance of intensive care units: Does good management make a difference? Metl Care. 1994;32(5):508-525.
23. McWilliam CL, Wong CA. Keeping it secret: The costs and benefits of nursing's hidden work in discharging patients. J Aeli'Mtrs. 1994;19;152-163.
24. Dewar I3J, Clark JM. The role of the paid non-professional nursing helper: A review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17:113-120.
25. Minnick A, Leahey M, Pischke-Winn K. The impact of patient point-of-view pharmacy delivery on labor and quality. Nurs Econ. 1994;12(1):45-50.
26. Shamian J, Hagen 15, Hu T\V, Fog-arty TE. Nursing resource requirement and support services. Kurs Econ. 1992;10(2): 110-115.
27. Smith HL, Mitry N\V. Nursing leadership: A buffering perspective. Nurs Adm Q. 1984;8 (2):43-52.
28. Huber GP, McDaniel RR. The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management Science. 1986;32: 572-589.
29. Huber GP. The nature and design of postindustrial organizations. Management Science. 1984;30:928-951.