Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 983-989

  Hills, James R ^a   Cardella, John F ^a   Cardella, Kay ^a   Waybill, Peter N ^a  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheters and catheterization, central venous access; Catheters and catheterization, complications; Catheters and catheterization, technology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER INFECTION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 0030700012     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(97)70698-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kaufman JA, Salamipour H, Geller SC, Rivitz SM, Waltman AC. Long-term outcomes of radiologically placed arm ports. Radiology 1996; 201:725-730.
2. Foley MJ. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (P.A.S.-Port): results in 150 patients. JVIR 1995; 6:255-262.
3. Mauro MA, Jaques PF. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous catheters: a review. JVIR 1993; 4:127-137.
4. Struk DW, Bennett JD, Kozak RI. Insertion of subcutaneous central venous infusion ports by interventional radiologists. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995; 46:32-36.
5. Lund GB, Trerotola SO, Scheel PF, et al. Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists. Radiology 1996; 198:467-472.
6. Cardella JF, Cardella K, Bacci N, Fox P, Post JH. Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. JVIR 1996; 7:5-13.
7. Hull JE, Hunter CS, Luiken GA. The Groshong catheter: initial experience and early results of imagingguided placement. Radiology 1992; 185:803-807.
8. Morris SL, Jaques PF, Mauro MA. Radiologic placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for chronic venous access. Radiology 1992; 184:149-151.
9. Nosher JL, Shami MM, Seigel RL, DeCandia M, Bodner LJ. Tunneled central venous access catheter placement in the pediatric population: comparison of radiologic and surgical results. Radiology 1994; 192:265-268.
10. Openshaw KL, Picus D, Hicks ME, Darcy MD, Vesely TM, Picus J. Interventional radiologic placement of Hohn central venous catheters: results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. JVIR 1994; 5:111-115.
11. Mauro MA, Jaques PF. Insertion of long term hemodialysis catheters by interventional radiologists: the trend continues. Radiology 1996; 198:316-317.
12. Kahn ML, Barboza RB, Kling GA, Heisel JE. Initial experience with percutaneous placement of the P.A.S.-port implantable venous access device. JVIR 1992; 3:459-461.
13. Brant-Zawadzki M, Anthony M, Mercer EC. Implantation of a P.A.S.-port venous access device in the forearm under fluoroscopic guidance. AJR 1993; 160:1127-1128.
14. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993; 184-188.
15. Salem RR, Ward BA, Ravikumar TS. A new peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for patients requiring chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11:2181-2185.
16. Winters V, Peters B, Coila S, Jones L. A trial with a new peripheral implanted vascular access device. Oncol Nurs Forum 1990; 17:891-896.
17. Finney R, Albrink MH, Hart MB, Rosemurgy AS. A cost-effective peripheral venous port system placed at the bedside. J Surg Res 1992; 53: 17-19.
18. Carey PC, Mann DV, Windsor ACJ, et al. Long-term circulatory access via a peripheral implantable port. Br J Surg 1993; 80:600-601.
19. Pullyblank AM, Carey PD, Pearce SZ, Tanner AG, Guillou PJ, Monson JR. Comparison between peripherally implanted ports and externally sited catheters for long-term venous access. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76:33-38.
20. Mueller BU, Skelton J, Callender DP, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the infectious and noninfectious complications of an externalized catheter versus a subcutaneously implanted device in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10:1943-1948.
21. Torramade JR, Cienfuegos JA, Hernandez JL, et al. The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients. Eur J Surg 1993; 159:323-327.
22. Barrios CH, Zuke JE, Blaes B, Hirsch JD, Lyss AP. Evaluation of an implantable venous access system in a general oncology population. Oncology 1992; 49:474-478.
23. Caldwell JW, Malendez PR, Johnson RH. Experience in seventy-six patients comparing subcutaneous infusion ports and implanted right atrial catheters. Clin Res 1990; 38: 113A.
24. Ross MN, Haase GM, Poole MA, Burrington JD, Odom LF. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988; 167:141-144.
25. Greene FL, Moore W, Strickland G, McFarland J. Comparison of a totally implantable access device for chemotherapy (Port-A-Cath) and long-term percutaneous catheterization (Broviac). South Med J 1988; 81:580-583.
26. Wurzel CL, Halom K, Feldman JG, Rubin LG. Infection rates of Broviac-Hickman catheters and implantable venous devices. Am J Dis Child 1988; 142:536-540.
27. Van der Pili H, Frissen PH. Experience with a totally implantable venous access device (Port-A-Cath) in patients with AIDS. AIDS 1992; 6:709-713.
28. Makau L, Talamini MA, Sitzmann JV, Burns RC, McGuire ME. Long-term central venous access vs. other home therapies: complications in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. JPEN 1992; 16: 455-459.
29. Sweed M, Guenter P, Lucente K, Turner JL, Weingarten MS. Long-term central venous catheters in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23:194-199.