Variation in mitochondrial DNA in a cline of allele frequencies and shell phenotype in the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus (L.)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 299-312

  Kirby, Richard R ^a   Berry, R J ^b   Powers, D A ^c  

^a PLYMOUTH MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Chromosomal variation; Coadaption; Introgression; Primary contact; Secondary contact; Shell shape; Temperature

Indexed keywords

DOG WHELK; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRID ZONE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION;

DEVON; ENGLAND; UK;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; GASTROPODA; NUCELLA LAPILLUS;

EID: 0030697131     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1997.0164     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Atkinson WD, Newbury SF. 1984. The adaptations of the rough winkle, Littorina rudis, to desiccation and to dislodgement by wind and waves. Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 915-105.
2. Avis JC. 1994. Molecular Markers Natural History and Evolution. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. Baker RJ, Davis SK, Bradley RD, Hamilton MJ, Van Den Bussche RA. 1989. Ribosomal-DNA, mitochondrial-DXA. chromosomal, and allozymic studies on a contact zone in the pocket gopher, Geomys. Evolution 43: 63-75.
4. Bantock CR, Cockayne WL. 1975. Chromosomal polymorphism in Nucella lapillus. Hereditary 34: 145-231.
5. Bantock CR, Page CM. 1976. Chromosomal polymorphism in the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus (L.). In: Jones K, Brandham PE, eds. Current Chromosome Research. Amsterdam, New York, London: North Holland, 159-166.
6. Barton NH, Jones JS. 1983. Mitochondrial DNA: new clues about evolution. Nature 306: 317-318.
7. Berry RJ. 1983. Polymorphic shell banding in the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus (Mollusca). Journal of Zoology, London 200: 455-470.
8. Berry RJ. 1989. Ecology: where genes and geography meet. Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 733-759.
9. Berry RJ, Crothers JH. 1968. Stabilizing selection in the dog-whelk (Nucella lapillus). Journal of Zoology, London 155: 5-17.
10. Berry RJ, Crothers JH. 1970. Genotypic stability and physiological tolerance in the dog-whelk (Nucella lapillus). Journal of Zoology, London 162: 293-302.
11. Berry RJ, Crothers JH. 1974. Visible variation in the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus. Journal of Zoology, London 174: 123-148.
12. Boom R, Sol CJA, Salimans MMM, Jansen CL, Wertheim-Van Dillen PME, Van Der Noordaa J. 1990. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28: 495-503.
13. Boore JL, Brown WM. 1994. Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the black chiton Katharina tunicata. Genetics 138: 423-443.
14. Burrows MT, Hughes RN. 1989. Natural foraging of the dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus (Linnaeus): the weather and whether to feed. Journal of Molluscan Studies 55: 285-295.
15. Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 252-271.
16. Connell JH. 1972. Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 3: 169-192.
17. Crothers JH. 1973. On variation in Nucella lapillus (L.): shell shape variation in populations from Pembrokeshire, South Wales. Proceedings of the Malacological Society, London 40: 318-327.
18. Crothers JH. 1975. On variation in Nucella lapillus (L.): shell shape in populations from the south coast of England. Proceedings of the Malacological Society, London 41: 489-498.
19. Crothers JH. 1983. Variation in dog-whelk shells in relation to wave action and crab predation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 20: 85-102.
20. Crothers JH. 1985. Dog-whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus. Field Studies 6: 291-360.
21. Day AJ. 1990. Microgeographic variation in allozyme frequencies in relation to the degree of exposure to wave action in the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus (L.) (Prosobranchia: Muricacea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 40: 245-261.
22. Day AJ, Leinaas HP, Anstensrud M. 1993. Allozyme differentiation of populations of the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus, (L.): the relative effects of geographic distance and variation in chromosome number. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 51: 257-277.
23. Etter RJ. 1988. Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus. Evolution 42: 660-680.
24. Harrison RG, Rand DM, Wheeler WC. 1987. Mitochondrial DNA variation in field crickets across a narrow hybrid zone. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 144-158.
25. Hoxmark RC. 1970. The chromosome dimorphism of Nucella lapillus (Prosobranchia) in relation to wave exposure. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 18: 229-238.
26. Hoxmark RC. 1971. Shell variation in Nucella lapillus in relation to environmental and genetical factors. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 19: 145-148.
27. Hughes RN. 1972. Annual production of two Nova Scotian populations of Nucella lapillus (L.). Oecologia 8: 356-370.
28. Hultman T, Stahl S, Hornes E, Uhlen M. 1989. Direct solid phase sequencing of genomic and plasmid DNA using magnetic beads as solid support. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 4937-4946.
29. Janson K. 1982. Genetic and environmental effects of the growth rate of Littorina saxatilis. Marine Biology 69: 73-78.
30. Janson K. 1987. Allozyme and shell variation in two marine snails (Littorina, prosobranchia) with different dispersal abilities. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 30: 245-256.
31. Johannesson K, Warmoes T. 1980. Rapid colonisation of Belgian breakwaters by the direct developer, Littorina saxatilis (Olivi) (Prosobranchia, Mollusca). Hydrobiologia 193: 99-108.
32. Kirby RR. 1992. Adaptation in the dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus (L.). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of London.
33. Kirby RR, Bayne BL, Berry RJ. 1994a. Phenotypic variation along a dine in allozyme and karyotype frequencies, and its relationship with habitat, in the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus, L. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 53: 255-275.
34. Kirby RR, Bayne BL, Berry RJ. 1994b. Physiological variation in the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus, L. either side of a dine in allozyme and karyotype frequencies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 53: 277-290.
35. Kitching J. 1977. Shell form and niche occupation in Nucella lapillus (L.) (Gastropoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 26: 275-287.
36. Kitching J. 1986. The ecological significance and control of shell variability in dogwhelks from temperate shores. In: Moore PG, Seed R. eds. The ecology of rocky coasts. London: Hodder and Staughton, 234-248.
37. Kitching JA, Muntz L, Ebling FJ. 1996. The ecology of Lough Ine. XV: The ecological significance of shell and body forms in Nucella. Journal of Animal Ecology 35: 113-126.
38. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86: 6196-6200.
39. Lamb T, Avise JC. 1986. Directional introgression of mitochondrial DNA in a hybrid population of tree frogs: the influence of mating behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 83: 2526-2530.
40. Le Mesurier B. 1980. South Devon Coast Path. HMSO, London.
41. Lewis JR. 1968. Water movements and their role in rocky shore ecology. Sarsia 34: 13-36.
42. Marchant AD. 1988. Apparent introgression of mitochondrial DNA across a narrow hybrid zone in the Caledia captiva species-complex. Heredity 60: 39-46.
43. McCarter NH, Thomas AD. 1980. Patterns of animal and plant distribution on rocky shores in the South Hams, Devon. Field Studies 5: 229-258.
44. Menge BA. 1978a. Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community. Relation between predator foraging activity and environmental harshness. Oecologia, Berlin 34: 1-16.
45. Menge BA. 1978b. Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community. Effect of algal canopy, wave action and desiccation on predator feeding rates. Oecologia, Berlin 34: 17-35.
46. Morgans D. 1996. Physiological adaptation and genetic composition in the littoral dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus (L.). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of London.
47. Nelson K, Baker RJ, Honeycutt RL. 1987. Mitochondrial DNA and protein differentiation between hybridizing cytotypes of the white-footed mouse. Peromyscus leucopus. Evolution 41: 864-972.
48. Newkirk GF, Doyle RW. 1975. Genetic analysis of shell shape variation in Littorina saxatilis on an environmental dine. Marine Biology 30: 227-237.
49. Orme AR. 1961. The raised beaches and strandlines of south Devon. Field Studies 1: 108-130.
50. Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. 1991. The simple fools guide to PCR, Version 2. University of Hawaii Zoology Department, Honolulu, HI.
51. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy uf Sciences USA 74: 5463-5467.
52. Spolsky CM, Uzzell T. 1984. Natural interspecies transfer of mitochondrial DNA in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81: 5802-5805.
53. Spolsky CM, Uzzell T. 1986. Evolutionary history of the hybridogenetic frog Rana esculenta as deduced from mtDNA analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 3: 44-56.
54. Staiger H. 1957. Genetical and morpholocical variation in Purpura lapillus with respect to local and regional differentiation of population groups. Année Biologique 33: 251-258.
55. Szymura JM, Spolsky CM, Uzzell T. 1985. Concordant change in mitochondrial and nuclear genes in a hybrid zone between two frog species (genus Bombina). Experientia 41: 1469-1470.