Reliability of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 280-284

  Tetzschner, T ^a   Sorensen M ^a   Rasmussen, O O ^a   Lose, G ^a   Christiansen, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUDENDAL NERVE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030669548     PISSN: 01791958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003840050106     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Snooks SJ, Swash M (1985) Nerve stimulation techniques. In: Henry MM, Swash M (eds) Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Butterworths, University Press, Cambridge, pp 112-117
2. Smith ALB, Honker G, Whirl D (1989) The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynecol 96: 29-32
3. Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Normal and delayed conduction in the pudendal nerves of patients with idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47: 820-823
4. Smith ALB, Honker G, Whirl G (1989) The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study. Gynecol 96: 24-28
5. Snooks SJ, Barnes PRH, Swash M (1984) Damage to the innervation of the voluntary anal and periurethral sphincter musculature in incontinence: an electrophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47: 1269-1273
6. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Christiansen J, Lose G (1996) Anal and/or urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 1034-1040
7. Rogers J, Henry MM, Miesewicz JJ (1988) Disposable pudendal nerve stimulator: evaluation of the standard instrument and a new device. Gut 29: 1131-1133
8. Rogers J, Laurberg S, Misiewicz JJ, Henry MM, Swash M (1989) Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function. Br J Surg 76: 607-609
9. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I: 307-310
10. Murray GD, Miller R (1990) Statistical comparison of two methods of clinical measurement. Br J Surg 77: 384-387
11. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Rasmussen OØ, Lose G, Christiansen J (1995) Pudendal nerve damage increases the risk of faecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74: 434-440
12. Sørensen M, Rasmussen, OØ, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J (1992) Physiological agreement in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 92: 1106-1108
13. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN (1994) Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 22-28
14. Laurberg S, Swash M (1989) The effect of aging on anorectal sphincters and their innervation. Dis Colon Rectum 32: 737-742