|
|
Volumn 337, Issue 24, 1997, Pages 1768-1771
|
|
The rule of double effect - A critique of its role in end-of-life decision making
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEATH;
EUTHANASIA;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RELIGION;
REVIEW;
TERMINAL CARE;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
CULTURAL DIVERSITY;
DECISION MAKING;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
ETHICS;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTENTION;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
NARCOTICS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINAL CARE;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030667510
PISSN: 00284793
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199712113372413 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (300)
|
|
References (42)
|
