Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix;CANCER MICRO-INVASIF DU COL UTERIN

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 662-670

  Lecuru F ^a   Huffman, H ^a   Mezan De Malartic, C ^a   Taurelle, R ^a  

^a Hopital Boucicaut   (France)

Author keywords

Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix

Indexed keywords

AGE; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; CONIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0030665867     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Mestwerdt G. Die Frühdiagnose des Kollumkarzinom. Zentralb Gynäkol 1947;69:198-202.
2. FIGO Cancer Comittee. Staging anouncemenent. Gynecol Oncol 1986;25:383-5.
3. Cervical and vulva cancer : changes in FIGO definitions and staging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:405-6.
4. Seski JC, Murray RA, Morley G. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Definition, histologic analysis, late results of treatment. Obstet Gynecol 1977;57:410-4.
5. Andersen E, Nielsen K, Pedersen B. The reliability of preconization diagnostic evaluation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:143-7.
6. Benedet J, Anderson G, Boyes D. Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:557-62.
7. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H, Miller I, Mann E, Jandial L, Fisher P. A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix. A colposcopic and cytologic analysis. Gynecol Oncol 1992;45:9-12.
8. Hoffman M, Collins E, Roberts W, Fiorica J, Gunasekaran S, Cavanagh D. Cervical conization with frozen section before planned hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:394-8.
9. Oyesanya O, Amerasinghe C, Manning E. Outpatient excisional management of cervical intraepithalial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;768:485-8.
10. Fowler J, Davos I, Leuchter R, Lagasse L. Effect of CO2 laser conization of the uterine cervix on pathologic interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:693-8.
11. Burghardt E. Microinvasive carcinoma in gynaecological pathology. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1984;11:239-57.
12. Burghardt E. Pathology of early invasive squamous and glandular carcinoma of cervix (FIGO Stage la). Gynecologic Oncology. Ed M Coppleson. Sec Ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone 1992:609-29.
13. Hasumi K, Sakamoto A, Sugano H. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1980;45:928-31.
14. Simon N, Gore H, Shingleton H, Soong S, Orr J, Hatch K. Study of superficially invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:19-24.
15. Kolstad P. Follow-up study of 232 patients with stage 1a1 and 411 patients with stage 1a2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1989;33:265-72.
16. Taurelle R, Lécuru F. Cervical carcinoma of young women. Is conservative treatment suitable ? Cases of microinvasive carcinoma. Pathol Biol 1994;42:950.
17. Al-Nafussi A, Hughes D. Histological features of CIN III and their value in predicting invasive microinvasive squamous carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:799-804.
18. Yajima A, Noda K. The results of treatment of microinvasive carcinoma (stage 1A) of the uterine cervix by means of simple and extended hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:685-8.
19. Van Nagell JR, Donaldson ES, Wood EG, Parker JC. The significance of vascular invasion and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1978;41:228-31.
20. Tsukamoto N, Kaku T, Matsukuma K. The problem of stage la (FIGO 1985) carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1989;34:1-6.
21. Delgado G, Bundy B, Fowler W et al. A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix : a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 1989;35:314-20.
22. Bellino R, Wierdis T, Arisio R et al. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemna. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1994;15:380-5.
23. Van Nagell J, Greenwell N, Powell D, Donaldson E, Hanson M, Gay E. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:981-91.
24. Bendet JL, Anderson GH. Stage la carcinoma of the cervix revisited. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:6-14.
25. Hopkins M, Morley G. Microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Reprod Med 1994;39:671-3.
26. Barber HR, Somers SC, Rotterdam H, Kwon T. Vascular invasion as a prognostic factor in stage lb cancer of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:343-6.
27. Roche W, Norris H. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. The significance of lymphatic invasion and confluent patterns of growth. Cancer 1975;36:180-186.
28. Morgan P, Anderson M, Buckley C et al. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix study : preliminary results. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:664-8.
29. Pearson S, Whittaker J, Ireland D, Monaghan J. Invasive cancer after cervix laser treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:486-8.
30. Anderson M. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix following local destructive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:657-63.
31. Johnson N, Lilford R, Jones S, Mc Kenzie L, Billingsley P, Songane F. Using decision analysis to calculate the optimum treatment for microinvasive cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1992;65:717-22.
32. Morris M, Mitchell M, Silva E, Coppeland L, Gershenson D. Cervical conization as a definitive therapy for early invasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:193-6.
33. Ueki M, Okamoto Y, Misaki O et al. Conservative therapy for microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994;53:109-13.
34. Yaegashi N, Sato S, Inoue Y, Noda K, Yajima A. Conservative surgical treatment in cervical cancer with 3 to 5 stromal invasion in the absence of confluent invasion and lymphvascular space involvement. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:333-7.
35. Paterson-Brown S, Chappatte O, Clark S, Wright A, Maxwell P, Taub N. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:182-5.
36. Monk A, Pushkin S, Nelson A, Gunning J. Conservative management of options for patients with dysplasia involving cervical margins of cervical cone biopsy specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1695-700.