Assessment of dose equivalent due to neutrinos

Health Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 894-898

  Cossairt, J Donald ^b   Grossman, Nancy L ^b   Marshall, Elaine T ^a  

^a FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Accelerators; Dose assessment; Dosimetry; Radiobiology

Indexed keywords

ASTRONOMY; COSMIC RADIATION; DOSIMETRY; ELECTRON ACCELERATOR; IONIZING RADIATION; NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY; NEUTRON RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION SCATTERING; REVIEW; SOLAR RADIATION;

EID: 0030665424     PISSN: 00179078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199712000-00002     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bahcall, J. Neutrino astrophysics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
2. Barendsen, G. W. RBE-LET relationships for DNA lesions and different types of cellular damage. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:359-362; 1994.
3. Boehm, F.; Vogel, P. Physics of massive neutrinos. Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
4. Cember, H. Introduction to health physics. New York: Pergamon Press; 1983.
5. Collar, J. Biological effects of stellar collapse neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:999-1002; 1996.
6. Cossairt, J. D.; Marshall, E. T. Comment on "Biological effects of stellar collapse neutrinos." Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:1394; 1997.
7. Drukier, A.; Stodolsky, L. Principles and applications of a neutral-current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy. Phys. Rev. D30:2295-2309; 1984.
8. Edwards, A. A.; Finnon, P.; Moquet, J. E.; Lloyd, D. C.; Darroudi, F.; Natarajan, A. T. The effectiveness of high energy neon ions in producing chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:299-303; 1994.
9. Goodhead, D. H. Spatial and temporal distribution of energy. Health Phys. 55:231-240; 1988.
10. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. New York: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 60; 1991.
11. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Report of the task group on reference man. Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Report 23; 1975.
12. Jenner, T. J.; de Lara, C. M.; Stevens, D. L.; Burns, N. A.; O'Neill, P. The induction of DNA double strand breaks in V79-4 cells by γ and α radiations - complexity of damage. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:289-293; 1994.
13. Kiefer, J; Ikpeme, S.; Akpa, T. C.; Weber, K. J. DNA double strand break induction by very heavy ions: dependence on physical parameters. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:295-298; 1994.
14. Langacker, P.; Erler, J. Standard model of electroweak interactions. Phys. Rev. D54:85-93; 1996.
15. NCRP. The relative biological effectiveness of radiations of different quality. Washington, DC: NCRP; Report 104; 1990.
16. Particle Data Group. Review of particle properties. Phys. Rev. D45:S1-S584; 1992.
17. Scholz, M.; Kraft, G. Calculation of heavy ion inactivation probabilities based on track structure, x ray sensitivity and target size. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:29-33; 1994.
18. Schopper, H., ed. Shielding against high energy radiation; Landolt-Bürnstein numerical data and functional relationships; science and technology, new series; group I: nuclear and particle physics volume II. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
19. Turner, J. E.; Fry, R. J. M. High LET radiation carcinogenesis: what do we know and what do we need to know? Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 52:189-196; 1994.