Controversies in third molar surgery - The national view on review strategies

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 319-322

  Pratt, C A ^a   Hekmat, M ^a   Pratt, S D ^a   Zaki, G A ^a   Barnard, J D W ^a,b  

^a QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Queen Alexandra Hospital   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

AGE; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MOLAR TOOTH; POSTOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 0030664707     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-4356(97)90403-4     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Shepherd JP, Brickley M. Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ 1994; 309: 620-621.
2. Brickley M, Shepherd J, Mancini G. Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 102-105.
3. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, postoperative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33: 33-35.
4. Pratt CA, Hekmat M. Are we really removing too many wisdom teeth? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33: 122.
5. Hekmat M. The necessity for postoperative review following third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33: 121.
6. Falconer DT, Roberts EE. Report of an audit into third molar exodontia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 183-185.
7. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. [1957] 2 All ER 118 [1957] 1 WLR 582 (McNair J).
8. Sidaway v Governors of Royal Bethlem Hospital. [1985] 1 All ER 643-666.
9. Colin W, Donoff RB. Restoring sensation after trigeminal nerve injury: a review of current management. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 80-84.
10. Robinson PP, Smith KG. A study of the efficacy of late lingual nerve repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34: 96-103.