Why do we continue to take unnecessary smears?

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 47, Issue 423, 1997, Pages 645-646

  Woodman, C B J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Family planning services; Questionnaire survey; Smear tests

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAKTHROUGH BLEEDING; CONDYLOMA; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTCOITAL TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUALITY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ENGLAND; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0030659540     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Spence MT, Woodman CBJ, Collins S, et al. Cervical smears - an opportunity for disinvestment? Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 537-538.
2. Fahey MT, Irwig I., Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 7: 680-685.