Algorithms for optimal linear combinations of neural networks

IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks - Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 1997, Pages 242-247

  Hashem, Sherif ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT NETWORKS; GENERALIZATION ABILITY; INDIVIDUAL NETWORK; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; LINEAR DEPENDENCY; OPTIMAL COMBINATION WEIGHT; PHYSICAL QUANTITIES; TRAINED NEURAL NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

OPTIMAL LINEAR COMBINATIONS;

EID: 0030653274     PISSN: 10987576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICNN.1997.611672     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. D. A. Belsley. Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991.
2. V. Cherkassky, D. Gehring, and F. Mulier. Pragmatic comparison of statistical and neural network methods for function estimation. In Proceedings ofthe 1995 World Congress on Neural Networks, volume II, pages 917-926,1995.
3. R. T. Clemen. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5:559-583,1989.
4. S. Hashem. 0 ptimal Linear Combinations of Neural Networks. PhD thesis, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, Dec. 1993.
5. S. Hashem. Effects of collinearity on combining neural networks. Connection Science, 8(3 & 4):315-336,1996.
6. S. Hashem and B. Schmeiser. Approximating a function and its derivatives using MSE-optimal linear combinations of trained feedforward neural networks, hi Proceedings of the 1993 World Congress on Neural Networks, volume I, pages 617-620,New Jersey, 1993. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. S. Hashem and B. Schmeiser. Improving model accuracy using optimal linear combinations of trained neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(3):792-794,1995.
8. S. Hashem, B. Schmeiser, and Y. Yih. Optimal linear combinations of neural networks: An overview. In Proceedings ofthe 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, volume III, pages 1507-1512. IEEE Press, 1994
9. S. Hashem, Y. Yih, and B. Schmeiser. An efficient model for product allocation using optimal combinations of neural networks. In C. Dagli, L. I. Burke,B. R. Fernandez,and J. Ghosh, editors, Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, volume 3, pages 669-674. ASME Press, 1993.
10. J.-N. Hwang, S.-R. Lay, M. Maechler, R. D. Martin, and J. Schimert. Regression modeling in back-propagation and projection pursuit learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(3):342-353, May 1994.
11. M. Maechler, D. Martin, J. Schimert, M. Csoppenszky,and J. Hwang. Projection pursuit learning networks for regression. In Proceedings ofthe 2nd International Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence, Washington DC., pages 350-358. IEEE Press, November 1990.
12. M. P. Perrone and L. N. Cooper. When networks disagree: Ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks. In R. J. Mammone, editor, Neural Networks for Speech and [mage Processing. Chapman & Hall, 1993.
13. A. J. Sharkey. On combining artificial neural nets. Connection Science, 8(3 & 4):299-314, 1996.
14. I. M. Sobol'. The Monte Carlo method. University of Chicago Press, 1974. Translated and adapted from the 2nd Russian edition by R. Messer, J. Stone, and P. Fortini.