A methodology for evaluation of task performance in robotic systems: A case study in vision-based localization

Machine Vision and Applications

Volumn 9, Issue 5-6, 1997, Pages 304-320

  Venetianer, Péter L ^a,b,c   Large, Edward W ^a,d,e,f   Bajcsy, Ruzena ^{a,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n}  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^d SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Ohio State University ^*

^f OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^h STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^j NRC Comp Sci Telecommunication Bd   (United States)

^k ACM   (United States)

^l CRA Board   (United States)

^m IEEE   (United States)

ⁿ NAS Institute of Medicine   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; ROBOTICS; SYSTEM THEORY;

ERROR BIASES; ERROR BOUNDS; VISION BASED LOCALIZATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0030644620     PISSN: 09328092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001380050050     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bobet P, Schmid C (1994) Obstacle Detection Analysis. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 796-799
2. Grimson WEL (1990) Object recognition by computer: the role of geometric constraints MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Lapreste J, Rives G Dhom M, Richetin M, (1989) Determination of the attitude of 3-D objects from a single perspective view IEEE PAMI 11:1265-1278
4. Kite DH, Magee M (1990) Determining the 3D position and orientation of a robot camera using 2D monocular vision Pattern Recognition. 23:819-831
5. Lazanas A, Latombe JC (1995) Motion planning with uncertainty: a landmark approach Artificial Intelligence 76:287-317
6. Gilg A Schmidt G (1994) Landmark-oriented visual navigation of a mobile robot IEEE Transactions on industrial Electronics 41:392-397
7. Burl MC, Perona P (1996) Recognition of planar object classes In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, June, pp 223-230
8. Fukui I (1981) TV image processing to determine the position of a robot vehicle. Pattern Recognition 14:101-109
9. Courtney JW, Magee MJ, Aggarwal JK (1984) Robot guidance using computer vision Pattern Recognition 17:585-592
10. Abouf EW, Drucker SM, Atkeson CG (1989) Task-level robot learning: juggling a tennis ball more accurately. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, May, pp 1290-1295
11. De Geeter J (1996) A confidence set approach to localization. Technical report, GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
12. Bajcsy R, Kamberova G, Mandelbaum R, Mintz M (1996) Robust fusion of position data. Workshop on Foundations of Information/Decision Fusion, Washington, August, pp 1-7
13. Kamberova G, Mintz M (1996) Robust minimax rules under zero-one loss for a restricted location parameter. Technical report 404, GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
14. Mundelbaum R, Kamberova G, Mintz M (1996) Statistical decision theory for mobile robotics: theory and application. Technical report, GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
15. Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
16. Geisser S, Greenhouse SW (1958) An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29:885-891
17. Mulligan IJ (1996) Empirical evaluation of information for robotic manipulation tasks. Thesis. University of British Columbia
18. Forstner W (1996) 10 Pros and Cons Against Performance Characterisation of Vision Algorithms. In Workshop on Performance Characteristics of Vision Algorithms, Cambridge, April