Legislative and Legal Restrictions on Labeling Information Regarding the Use of Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 215-219

  Centner, T J ^a   Lathrop, K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Labeling requirements; Legislation; Regulations; Somatotropin

Indexed keywords

ARENA; BOVINAE;

GROWTH HORMONE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD PACKAGING; LEGAL ASPECT; MILK; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; FOOD LABELING; GROWTH HORMONE; MILK; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0030641742     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75930-7     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Centner, T. J., and R. Londhe. 1995. Regulating the sale of products from cows treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. Univ. Georgia Agric. Econ. Fac. Ser. 95-08. The Univ. Georgia, Athens.
2. Food and Drug Administration. 1994. Interim guidance on the voluntary labeling of milk and milk products from cows that have not been treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. Fed. Reg. 59(Feb. 10):6279.
3. Illinois Annotated Statutes. 1993. Chapter 410, paragraphs 620/2.1, /5, /11. Smith-Hurd, West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
4. Illinois Department of Agriculture. 1995. Illinois Department of Agriculture policy statement, use of bovine somatotropin. Illinois Dep. Agric., Springfield.
5. International Dairy Foods Association v. Amestoy. 1995. Civil Action No. 2:94CV199. Fed. Dist. Court, Brattleboro, VT.
6. Maine Department of Agriculture. 1994. Chapter 136, Official state of Maine grades and standards for milk and milk products for use with state of Maine quality trademark. Maine Dep. Agric., Div. Quality Assurance, Augusta.
7. Maine Revised Statutes Annotated. 1994. Title 7, Sections 443-B & 2901-B. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
8. Minnesota Statutes Annotated. 1995. Section 32.75. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
9. Potato Chip Institute v. General Mills, Inc. 1972. Fed. Suppl. 333:173; Fed. Rep. Second 461:1088. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
10. Stauber v. Shalala. 1995. Fed. Suppl., West. Dist. Court Wisconsin 895:1178. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
11. Tauer, L. W. 1994. The value of segmenting the milk market into bST-produced and non-bST-produced milk. Agribusiness 10:3.
12. Texas Health and Safety Code. 1996. Title 6, Sections 431.003 & 431.082. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
13. United States Code Annotated. 1994. Volume 21, Sections 301-382. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.
14. Vermont Administrative Procedure Bull. 1995. Adopted rules: rBST notification and labeling regulations relating to milk and milk products. State of Vermont, Montpelier.
15. Vermont Statutes Annotated. 1994. Section 2754. Butterworth Legal Publ., Orford, NH.
16. Wisconsin Administrative Code, Dep. Agric., Trade, and Consumer Prot. 1995. Chapter 83. State of Wisconsin, Madison.
17. Wisconsin Statutes Annotated. 1995. Section 97.25. West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.