Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro

Caries Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 24-29

  Rudolphy, M P ^a   Gorier, Y ^a   Van Loveren, C ^a   Van Amerongen, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Class II amalgam restoration; Radiography; Secondary caries diagnosis

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; RECURRENT DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MOLAR; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030638639     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000262369     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Allander L. Birkhcd D. Bratthal D: Reasons for replacement of class II amalgam restorations in private practice. Swed Dent J 1990:14:179-184.
2. Bishop YMM. Fienberg SE. Holland PW: Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge. MIT Press. 1975.
3. Espelid I. Tvcit AB: Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991:41:359-364.
4. Fitzgerald RJ. Adams BO. Davis ME: A microbiological study of recurrent dentinal caries. Caries Res 1994;28:409-415.
5. Foster LV: Validity of clinical judgements for the presence of secondary' caries associated with defective amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1994; 177:89-93.
6. Hays WL: Statistics for the Social Sciences. London. Holy, Rinehart & Winston. 1978, pp 326-327.
7. Jokstad A. Mjor I A, Qvist V: The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:234-242.
8. Kidd EAM. Joyston-Bechal S. Beighton D: Diagnosis of secondary caries: A laboratory study. Br Dent J 1994;176:135-139.
9. van der Linden LWJ, van Aken J: The origin of localized increased radiopacity in the dentin. Oral Surg Med Oral Pathol 1973:35:89-93.
10. Merret MCW, Elderton RJ: An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and dental caries. Br Dent J 1984:128-133.
11. Nuckles DB, Sneed WD. Baymc JB. Collins DE. Hook ChR. Welsh EL: Faculty differences in replacement decisions for amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int 1991;22:533-540.
12. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjór IA: Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990:48:297-303.
13. Rudolphy MP. van Amerongen JP, Penning Ch, ten Cate JM: Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations. Caries Res 1993:27:277-279.
14. Rudolphy MP, van Amerongen JP, Penning Ch, ten Cate JM: Grey discolouration and marginal fracture for the diagnosis of secondary caries in molars with occlusal amalgam restorations: An in vitro study. Caries Res 1995;29:371-376.