Negotiating symbolic space: Strategies to increase NP status and value

Nurse Practitioner

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 89-103

  Martin, Patricia D ^a   Hutchinson, Sally A ^b  

^a Health care quality management consultant   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; ROLE PLAYING; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SYMBOLISM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; ROLE; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL VALUES; SYMBOLISM;

EID: 0030636231     PISSN: 03611817     EISSN: 15388662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00006205-199701000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Avorn J, Everitt DE, Baker MW: The neglected medical history and therapeutic choices for abdominal pain. Archives Internal Medicine 1991; 151:694-98.
2. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the U.S. (OTA): Health technology case study 37. Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives: A policy analysis. Washington, DC: 1986.
3. Sackett DL, Spitzer WO, Gent M, et al: The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner: Health outcomes of patients. Annals of Internal Medicine 1974; 80:137-42.
4. Hadley EH: Nurses and prescriptive authority: A legal and economic analysis. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1989;15:245-99.
5. National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN): Position paper on the license of advanced nursing practice. National Council of State Boards, Inc., 1992.
6. Batey MV, Holland JM: Impact of structural autonomy accorded through state regulatory policies on nurses prescribing practices. Image, The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1983;15:84-89.
7. Jacox A: The OTA report: A policy analysis. Nursing outlook 1987; 36:262-67.
8. Scott, CL, Harrison OA: Direct reimbursement Nichols LM: Estimating costs of under using advanced practice nurses. Nursing Economics 1992; 10:343-45, 348-51.
9. Mahoney DF: Employer resistance to state-authorized prescriptive authority for NPs. Results from a pilot study. Nurse Practitioner 1995; 20(1):58-61.
10. Bezjak JE: Physician-perceived incentives for association with nurse practitioners. Health Care Issues 1987; 12:67-74.
11. Hall JA, Palmer IIR, Orav EJ, et al: Performance quality, gender and professional role. A study of physicians and non-physicians in 16 ambulatory care practices. Medical Care 1990;28:489-501.
12. Johnson RE, Freeborn DK: Comparing HMO physicians’ attitudes towards NPs and PAs. Nurse Practitioner 1986;11(1):39/13-6,49.
13. Hall JM, Stevens, PE, Meleis, AI: Marginalization: A guiding concept for valuing diversity in nursing knowledge development. ANS, Advances in Nursing Science 1994; 16(4):23-41.
14. Glaser BG: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1978.
15. Hutchinson. Grounded theory. In Munhall PL, Oiler C, eds. Nursing research: A qualitative perspective. New York: National League for Nursing Press, 1993;180-212.
16. Bigus OE: The milkman and his customer: A cultivated relationship. Urban Life and Culture 1972; 1:131-65.
17. Freidson E: Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd Mead and Company, 1970a.