Quasi-indexicals and knowledge reports

Cognitive Science

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 63-107

  Rapaport, William J ^a   Shapiro, Stuart C ^b   Wiebe, Janyce M ^b  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030636175     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2101_3     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Almeida, M.J. (1987). Reasoning about the temporal structure of narratives (Tech. Rep. No. 87-10). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
2. Almeida, M.J. (1995). Time in narratives. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 159-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Almeida, M.J., & Shapiro, S.C. (1983). Reasoning about the temporal structure of narrative texts, Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Rochester). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ballim, A., & Wilks, Y. (1991). Artificial believers: The ascription of belief. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bruder, G.A., Duchan, J.F., Rapaport, W.J., Segal, E.M., Shapiro, S.C., & Zubin, D.A. (1986). Deictic centers in narrative: An interdisciplinary cognitive-science project (Tech. Rep. No. 86-20). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
8. Castañeda, H.-N. (1966). 'He': A study in the logic of self-consciousness. Ratio, 8, 130-157.
9. Castañeda, H.-N. (1967). Indicators and quasi-indicators. American Philosophical Quarterly, 4, 85-100.
10. Castañeda, H.-N. (1970). On the philosophical foundations of the theory of communication: Reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2 (1977), 165-186.
11. Castañeda, H.-N. (1972). Thinking and the structure of the world. Critica, 6, 43-86. (Reprinted in Philosophia, 4, 1974, 3-40)
12. Castañeda, H.-N. (1972). Thinking and the structure of the world. Critica, 6, 43-86. (Reprinted in Philosophia, 4, 1974, 3-40)
13. Castañeda, H.-N. (1989). Thinking, language, and experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Chalupsky, H. (1993). Using hypothetical reasoning as a method for belief ascription. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 119-133.
15. Fludernik, M. (1993). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.
16. Fodor, J.D. (1970/1979). The linguistic description of opaque contexts. New York: Garland Publishing.
17. Franchere, R. (1964). Hannah herself. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
18. Galbraith, M. (1995). Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement hi narrative. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 19-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123.
20. Grove, A.J. (1995). Naming and identity in epistemic logic; Part II: A first-order logic for naming. Artificial Intelligence, 74, 311-350.
21. Haas, A.R. (1993). Indexical expressions in the scope of attitude verbs. Computational Linguistics, 19, 637-649.
22. Halpern, J.Y. (Ed.) (1986). Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge: Proceedings of the 1986 Conference (Monterey, CA). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
23. Hamburger, K. (1973). The logic of literature. (M.J. Rose, Trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24. Hendrix, G. (1979). Encoding knowledge in partitioned networks. In N.V. Findler (Ed.), Associative networks: The representation and use of knowledge by computers (pp. 51-92). New York: Academic.
25. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief: An introduction to the logic of the two notions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
26. Hobbs, J.R. (1985). Ontological promiscuity. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Chicago (pp. 61-69). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Israel, D. (1989). Review of William J. Rapaport, "Logical foundations for belief representation." Journal of Symbolic Logic, 54, 617-618.
28. Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1976). Reflections on the foundations of narrative theory-From a linguistic point of view. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Pragmatics of language and literature (pp. 107-140). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Lehnert, W.G., Dyer, M.G., Johnson, P.N., Yang, C.J. & Harley, S. (1983). BORIS-An experiment in in-depth understanding of narratives, Artificial Intelligence, 20, 15-62.
31. Lespérance, Y. (1989). A formal account of self-knowledge and action. In N. S. Sridharan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89, Detroit) (Vol. 2, pp. 868-874). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
32. Lespérance, Y., & Levesque, H.J. (1990). Indexical knowledge in robot plans. Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90) (pp. 1030-1037). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
33. Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.J. (1995). Indexical knowledge and robot action-A logical account. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 69-115.
34. Li, N. (1991). Perspective-taking in Mandarin discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. SUNY Buffalo Department of Linguistics.
35. Li, N. & Zubin, D.A. (1995). Discourse continuity and perspective-taking. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 287-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Maida, A.S., & Shapiro, S.C. (1982). Intensional concepts in propositional semantic networks. Cognitive Science, 6, 291-330. (Reprinted in R.J. Brachman & H.J. Levesque (Eds.), Readings in knowledge representation (pp. 169-189), 1985, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann)
37. Maida, A.S., & Shapiro, S.C. (1982). Intensional concepts in propositional semantic networks. Cognitive Science, 6, 291-330. (Reprinted in R.J. Brachman & H.J. Levesque (Eds.), Readings in knowledge representation (pp. 169-189), 1985, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann)
38. Martins, J., & Shapiro, S.C. (1988). A model for belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 35, 25-79.
39. Meinong, A. (1904). Über Gegenstandstheorie [The theory of objects]. In R. Haller (Ed.) (1971). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, Vol. II (pp. 481-535) Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt. In R.M. Chisholm (Ed.) I. Levi et al. (Trans.) (1960). Realism and the background of phenomenology (pp. 76-117). New York: Free Press.
40. Meinong, A. (1904). Über Gegenstandstheorie [The theory of objects]. In R. Haller (Ed.) (1971). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, Vol. II (pp. 481-535) Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt. In R.M. Chisholm (Ed.) I. Levi et al. (Trans.) (1960). Realism and the background of phenomenology (pp. 76-117). New York: Free Press.
41. Plato, Theaetetus (1961). In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.). The collected dialogues of Plato (pp. 845-919). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42. Quine, W.V. (1956/1976). Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. In The ways of paradox and other essays, revised and enlarged edition (pp. 185-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
43. Rapaport, W.J. (1978). Meinongian theories and a Russellian paradox, Nous, 12, 153-180; Errata, Noûs, 13 (1979) 125.
44. Rapaport, W.J. (1981). How to make the world fit our language: An essay in Meinongian semantics. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 14, 1-21.
45. Rapaport, W.J. (1985). Meinongian semantics for propositional semantic networks, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Chicago (pp. 43-48). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
46. Rapaport, W.J. (1985/1986). Non-existent objects and epistemological ontology, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 25/26, 61-95.
47. (Reprinted in R. Haller (Ed.), 1986, Non-existence and predication. Amsterdam: Rodopi)
48. Rapaport, W.J. (1986). Logical foundations for belief representation. Cognitive Science, 10, 371-422.
49. Rapaport, W.J. (1988a). Review of Halpern (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53, 660-670.
50. Rapaport, W.J. (1988b). Syntactic semantics: Foundations of computational natural-language understanding. In J.H. Fetzer (Ed.), Aspects of artificial intelligence (pp. 81-131). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Reprinted in Eric Dietrich (Ed.), Thinking computers and virtual persons: Essays on the intentionality of machines (pp. 225-273). San Diego, Academic Press, 1994)
51. Rapaport, W.J. (1988b). Syntactic semantics: Foundations of computational natural-language understanding. In J.H. Fetzer (Ed.), Aspects of artificial intelligence (pp. 81-131). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Reprinted in Eric Dietrich (Ed.), Thinking computers and virtual persons: Essays on the intentionality of machines (pp. 225-273). San Diego, Academic Press, 1994)
52. Rapaport, W.J. (1991a). Predication, fiction, and artificial intelligence. Topoi, 10, 79-111.
53. Rapaport, W.J. (1991b). Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics. In H. Burkhardt & B. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of metaphysics and ontology (pp. 516-519). Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
54. Rapaport, W.J. (1992). Belief representation systems. In S.C. Shapiro (Ed.), Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 98-110). New York: John Wiley.
55. Rapaport, W.J. (1995). Understanding understanding: Syntactic semantics and computational cognition. In J.E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives, Vol. 9: AI, connectionism, and philosophical psychology (pp. 49-88). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
56. Rapaport, W.J. (1995). Understanding understanding: Syntactic semantics and computational cognition. In J.E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives, Vol. 9: AI, connectionism, and philosophical psychology (pp. 49-88). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
57. Rapaport, W.J., Segal, E.M., Shapiro, S.C., Zubin, D.A., Bruder, G.A., Duchan, J.F., Almeida, M.J., Daniels, J.H., Galbraith, M.M., Wiebe, J.M. & Yuhan, A.H. (1989a). Deictic centers and the cognitive structure of narrative comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 89-01). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
58. Rapaport, W.J., Segal, E.M., Shapiro, S.C., Zubin, D.A., Bruder, G.A., Duchan, J.F., & Mark, D.M. (1989b). Cognitive and computer systems for understanding narrative text (Tech. Rep. No. 89-07). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
59. Rapaport, W.J., & Shapiro, S.C. (1984). Quasi-indexical reference in prepositional semantic networks. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-84, Stanford University) (pp. 65-70). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
60. Rapaport, W.J., Shapiro, S.C. & Wiebe, J.M., (1986). Quasi-indicators, knowledge reports, and discourse (Tech. Rep. No. 86-15). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
61. Reboul, A. (1992). How much am I I and how much is she I? Lingua, 87, 169-202.
62. Roberts, L.D., & Rapaport, W.J. (1988). Quantifier order, reflexive pronouns, and quasi-indexicals (Tech. Rep. No. 88-16). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
63. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. (Reprinted in Logic and knowledge: Essays 1901-1950, pp. 39-56, 1956, by R.C. Marsh (Ed.) New York: Capricorn)
64. Seager, W. (1990). The logic of lost Lingens. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 19, 407-428.
65. Segal, E.M. (1995). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Sells, P. (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 445-479.
67. Shapiro, S.C. (1975). Generation as parsing from a network into a linear string. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 33, 45-62 (Microfiche).
68. Shapiro, C. (1979a). Generalized augmented transition network grammars for generation from semantic networks. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of California at San Diego (pp. 25-29).
69. Shapiro, S.C. (1979b). The SNePS semantic network processing system. In N.V. Findler (Ed.), Associative networks: The representation and use of knowledge by computers (pp. 179-203). New York: Academic.
70. Shapiro, S.C. (1982). Generalized augmented transition network grammars for generation from semantic networks. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 8, 12-25.
71. Shapiro, S.C. (1990). Cables, paths, and 'subconscious' reasoning in prepositional semantic networks. In J. Sowa (Ed.), Formal aspects of semantic networks (pp. 136-156). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
72. Shapiro, S.C. (1993). Belief spaces as sets of propositions. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 225-235.
73. Shapiro, S.C., & Martins, J.P. (1990). Recent advances and developments: The SNePS 2.1 report. In D. Kumar (Ed.), Current trends in SNePS Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 437 (pp. 1-13). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
74. Shapiro, S.C., & Rapaport, W.J. (1987). SNePS considered as a fully intensional prepositional semantic network. In N. Cercone & G. McCalla (Eds.), The knowledge frontier: Essays in the representation of knowledge (pp. 262-315). New York: Springer-Verlag.
75. Shapiro, S.C., & Rapaport, W.J. (1991). Models and minds: Knowledge representation for natural-language competence. In R. Cummins & J. Pollock (Eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays at the interface (pp. 215-259). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Shapiro, S.C., & Rapaport, W.J. (1992). The SNePS family. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23, 243-275. (Reprinted in F. Lehmann (Ed.) (1992) Semantic networks in artificial intelligence (pp. 243-275). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
77. Shapiro, S.C., & Rapaport, W.J. (1992). The SNePS family. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23, 243-275. (Reprinted in F. Lehmann (Ed.) (1992) Semantic networks in artificial intelligence (pp. 243-275). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
78. Shapiro, S.C., & Rapaport, W.J. (1995). An introduction to a computational reader of narratives. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 79-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Shapiro, S.C., & the SNePS Implementation Group (1994). SNePS-2.1 User's Manual. SNeRG Technical Note. Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
80. Tomberlin, J.E. (Ed.) (1983). Agent, language, and the structure of the world. Indianapolis: Hackett.
81. Tomberlin, J.E. (Ed.) (1986). Hector-Neri Castañeda. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
82. Von Eckardt, B. (1993). What is cognitive science? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Wiebe, J.M. (1990a). Recognizing subjective sentences: A computational investigation of narrative text (Tech. Rep. No. 90-03). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
84. Wiebe, J.M. (1990b). Identifying subjective characters in narrative. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90, University of Helsinki). (Association for Computational Linguistics), Vol. 2, pp. 401-408.
85. Wiebe, J.M. (1991). References in narrative text. Noûs, 25, 457-486. (Reprinted in Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective, pp. 263-286), by J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.) (1995, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)
86. Wiebe, J.M. (1991). References in narrative text. Noûs, 25, 457-486. (Reprinted in Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective, pp. 263-286), by J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.) (1995, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)
87. Wiebe, J.M. (1994). Tracking point of view in narrative. Computational Linguistics, 20, 233-287.
88. Wiebe, J.M., & Rapaport, W.J. (1986). Representing de re and de dicto belief reports in discourse and narrative. Proceedings of the IEEE, 74, 1405-1413.
89. Wiebe, J.M., & Rapaport, W.J. (1988). A computational theory of perspective and reference in narrative. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. SUNY Buffalo, (pp. 131-138). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
90. Wilks, Y., Ballim, A. & Dietrich, E. (1989). Pronouns in mind: Quasi-indexicals and the 'language of thought'. Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 8, 493-503.
91. Wyatt, R. (1989). The representation of opaque contexts (Tech. Rep. No. 89-13). Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.
92. Wyatt, R. (1990). Kinds of opacity and their representations. In D. Kumar (Ed.), Current trends in SNePS, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 437 (pp. 123-144). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
93. Wyatt, R. (1993). Reference and intensions. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 263-271.