Relevance of human papillomavirus screening in management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 176, Issue 1 I, 1997, Pages 87-92

  Kaufman, Raymond H ^a,b   Ervin Adam, M D ^a,b   Icenogle, Joseph ^a,b   Lawsoii, Herschel ^a,b   Lee, Nancy ^a,b   Reeves, K O ^a,b   Irwin, John ^a,b   Simon, Terry ^a,b   Press, Muan ^a,b   Uhler, Robert ^a,b   Entman, Carol ^a,b   Reeves, William C ^a,b  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DNA PROBE; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMA VIRUS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR; VIROLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; DNA PROBES, HPV; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0030635530     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80017-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kaufman RH. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic criteria and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1120-8.
2. Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Nielsen ML, Kline TS. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;l 1:390-6.
3. Ostor AG. Natural history of CIN: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993; 12:186-92.
4. Wright TC, Kurman RJ. A critical review of the morphologic classification systems of preinvasive lesions of the cervix: the scientific basis for shifting the paradigm. Papillomavirus Rep 1994;5:175-82.
5. Zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses in human cancer. Mol Carcenog 1988;l: 147-50.
6. Reeves WC, Brinton LA, Garcia M, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer in Latin America. N EnglJ Med 1989;320:1437-41.
7. Morison EA, Ho GY, Vermund SH, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and other risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a case control study. IntJ Cancer 1991;49:6-13.
8. Lungu O, Sun XW, Felix J, et al. Relationship of human papillomavirus type to grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. JAMA 1992:267:2493-6.
9. Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or III in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1272-8.
10. Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Critchlow CW, et al. Prevalence and cytologie manifestations of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, and 56 among 500 consecutive women. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1992; 11:197-203.
11. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose E, et al. The causal link between human papillomavirus and invasive cervical cancer: a case control study in Columbia and Spain. Int J Cancer 1992:52:743-9.
12. Lorincz AT, Reid R,Jenson AB, et al. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital human types. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79: 328-37.
13. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN. Epidemiologie evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:958-64.
14. Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Specific human papillomavirus types as the causal agents of most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: implications for current views and treatment. [ Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:934-5.
15. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Shah KV. The role of HPV in the etiology of cervical cancer. Mutât Res 1994;305: 293-301.
16. Cox TJ, Schiffman MH, Winzelberg AJ, Patterson JM. The evaluation of human papillomavirus testing as part of referral to colposcopy clinics. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:389-95.
17. The revised Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologie diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda Workshop. Acta Cytol 1992;36:273-6.
18. FlessJL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981.
19. Brookmyer R, Gail MH. AIDS epidemiology: a quantitative approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
20. Wright TC, Sun XW, KoulosJ. Comparison of management algorithms for the evaluation of women with low grade cytologie abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:202-10.
21. Hatch KD, Schneider A, Abdel-Nour MW. An evaluation of human papillomavirus testing for intermediate and highrisk types as triage before colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:1150-7.
22. CoxJT, Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH. Human papillomal'irus testing by Hybrid Capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologie diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:946-54.
23. Digene Diagnostics. Digene HPV Profile. Beltsville (MD) Digene Diagnostics, 1994; L03966-C/94.
24. Digene Diagnostics. Digene Hybrid Capture System. Beltsville (MD): Digene Diagnostics, 1993. L0412-L/93.