Cochlear implant studies at Research Triangle Institute and Duke University Medical Center

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 26, Issue 46, 1997, Pages 50-64

  Lawson, Dewey T ^a,c   Wilson, Blake S ^a,c   Finley, Charles C ^a,c   Zerbi, Mariangeli ^a   Cartee, Lianne A ^a   Roush, Patricia A ^b   Farmer, Joseph C ^c   Tucci, Debara L ^c  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Div of Speech Pathol and Audiology   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear prosthesis; Speech processing; Within subjects comparisons

Indexed keywords

COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; MALE;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 0030632726     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Boex C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. Improvements in speech recognition with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna: 1994; 136-40.
2. Boex C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 61-8.
3. Dillier N, Bogli H, Spillmann T. Speech encoding strategies for multielectrode cochlear implants: a digital signal processor approach. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 301-11.
4. Gantz BJ, McCabe BF, Tyler RS, Preece JP. Evaluation of four cochlear implant designs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987;96 (Suppl 128): 145-7.
5. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Finley CC. New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 313-21.
6. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Tenth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project N01-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, Neural Prosthesis Program 1995.
7. Miller GA, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338-52.
8. Owens E, Kessler DK, Raggio M, Schubert ED. Analysis and revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) battery. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 280-7.
9. Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic Psychophysics. Hear Res 1983; 11: 157-89.
10. Shannon RV, Adams DD, Ferrel RL, Palumbo RL Grandgenett M. A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 905-7.
11. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitfor LA, Seligman PM, Staller SJ, Shipp DM, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak (SPEAK) coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1995; 15 (Suppl 2): 15-27.
12. Tyler RS, Tye-Murray N. Cochlear implant signal-processing strategies and patient perception of speech and environmental sounds. In: Cooper H, ed., Cochlear implants; A practical guide, Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA, 1991; 58-83.
13. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Farmer JC, Lawson DT, Weber BA, Wolford RD, Kenan PD, White MW, Merzenich MM, Schindler RA. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1069-77.
14. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Finley CC. Speech processors for auditory prostheses, Fourth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project N01-DC-9-2401. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, Neural Prosthesis Program 1990.
15. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236-8.
16. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fifth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project N01-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, Neural Prosthesis Program 1993.
17. Wilson BS, Zerbi M, Lawson DT. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project N01-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, Neural Prosthesis Program 1993.
18. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Advances in coding strategies for cochlear implants. Adv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 9: 105-29.