Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: Issues of efficacy and assessment

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 26, Issue 46, 1997, Pages 17-25

  Boothroyd, Arthur ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Childhood deafness; Cochlear implants; Hearing aids; Hearing impairment; Speech perception tests

Indexed keywords

CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; GENERAL MEDICAL AIDS; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHONETICS; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEAFNESS; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030631944     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Boothroyd A. Evaluation of speech production in the hearing-impaired: Some benefits of forced-choice testing. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 185-96.
2. Boothroyd A. Assessment of speech perception capacity in profoundly deaf children. Am J Otol 1991a; 12 (Suppl): 67-72.
3. Boothroyd A. Speech perception measures and their role in the evaluation of hearing aid performance in a pediatric population. In: Feigin JA, Stelmachowicz PG feds.), Pediatric amplification. Omaha, NB: Boys Town National Research Hospital, 1991b: 77-91.
4. Boothroyd A. Recovery of speech perception performance after prolonged auditory deprivation: a case study. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 331-6.
5. Boothroyd A, Eran O. Auditory speech perception capacity of child implant users expressed as equivalent hearing loss. Volta Rev 1994; 96(5): 151-68.
6. Boothroyd A, Eran O, Hanin L. Speech perception and production in children with hearing impairment. In Bess FH, Grave JS, Tharpe AM (eds.), Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 1996; 55-74.
7. Carney AE, Osberger MJ, Camey E, Robbins AM, Renshaw J, Miyamoto RT. A comparison of speech discrimination with cochlear implants and tactile aids. J Acous Soc Am 1993; 94: 2035-49.
8. Eran O. The effects of age, input modality, and evaluation method on the measured speech imitation performance of profoundly hearing-impaired children. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York: New York, NY, 1996.
9. Geers AE, Brenner C. Speech perception results: audition and lipreading enhancement. Volta Rev 1994; 96(5): 85-96.
10. Hnath-Chisholm TE, Laippley E, Boothroyd A. Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity. J Speech Hear Res 1997 (In press).
11. Kirk KI, Osberger MJ, Robbins AM, Riley AI, Todd SL, Miyamoto RT. Performance of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, and cochlear implants. Semin Hear 1995; 16: 370-81.
12. Kraus N, McGee T, Sharma A, Carrell T, Nicol T. Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 158-64.
13. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Sharma A. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 1995: 16: 19-37.
14. Kuhl PK. Psychoacoustics and speech perception: internal standards. perceptual anchors, and prototypes. In: Werner LA, Rubel EW (eds.), Developmental psychoacoustics. Washington, D.C.: APA, 1992.
15. Kurtzberg D, Vaughan HG, Kreuzer JA, Fliegler KZ. Developmental studies and clinical applications of mismatch negativity: problems and prospects. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 105-17.
16. Lang AH, Eerola O, Korpilahti P, Holopainen I, Salo S, Aaltonen O. Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 118-30.
17. Laippley E. Chronological age effects on the audio/ visual perception of phonologically significant speech feature contrasts. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 1990.
18. Miyamoto RT, Osberger MJ, Robbins AJ, Renshaw JJ, Myres WA, Kessler K, Pope ML. Comparison of sensory aids in deaf children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 2-7.
19. Neuman AC. Late-onset auditory deprivation: a review of past research and an assessment of future research needs. Ear Hear 1996; 17: (Suppl): 3-13.
20. Ponton C, Don M. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 130-43.
21. Reed CM, Rabinowitz WM, Durlach NI, Braida LD, Conway-Fithian S, Schultz MC. Research in the TADOMA method of speech communication. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 247-57.
22. Sandridge SA, Boothroyd A. Using naturally produced speech to elicit mismatch negativity. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 7: 105-12.
23. Tobey E, Geers AE, Brenner C. Speech production results: speech feature acquisition. Volta Rev 1994; 96(5): 109-30.
24. Turner CW, Humes LE, Bentler RA, Cox RM. A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time. Ear Hear 1996; 17: (Suppl): 14-28.
25. Tyler RS. Speech perception by children. In: Tyler RS (ed.), Cochlear implants: audiological foundations. San Diego, CA: Singular Press, 1993; 191-256.
26. Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996; 17: (Suppl): 38-50.
27. Waldstein & Boothroyd. Speechreading supplemented by single-channel and multichannel tactile displays of voice fundamental frequency. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 38: 690-705.
28. Werner LA, Marean GC. Methods for estimating infant thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 1867-75.
29. Werner LA, Rubel EW. Developmental psychoacoustics. Washington, D.C.: APA, 1992.