Mutual Analysis: Boundary Violation or Failed Experiment?

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 569-571

  Berman, Emanuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRIA; FEMALE; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PSYCHOANALYSIS;

AUSTRIA; FEMALE; FREE ASSOCIATION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MALE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 0030630801     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651960450020101     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Berman, E. (1996). The Ferenczi renaissance. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 6:391–401.
2. Brabant, E., Falzeder, E., & Giampieri-Deutsch P., EDS. (1993). The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi: Vol. 1. 1908-1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Dupont, J., ED.(1988). The Clinical Diary of Sandor Ferenczi. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Dupont, J., ED. (1994). Freud's analysis of Ferenczi as revealed by their correspondence. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75: 301-320.
5. Falzeder, E., & Brabant, E., EDS. (1996). The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi: Vol. 2. 1914-1919. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. McLaughlin, J.T. (1995). Touching limits in the analytic dyad. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 64: 433-465.
7. Renik, O. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 64: 466-495.
8. Stanton, M. (1991). Sandor Ferenczi: Reconsidering Active Intervention. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.