Anatomical variation of human cancellous bone mechanical properties in vitro

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 40, Issue , 1997, Pages 157-173

  Hobatho, Marie Christine ^a,b   Rho, Jae Y ^b   Ashman, Richard B ^b  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CUBIC SPECIMENS; DEGREES OF ANISOTROPY; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; IN-VITRO; LUMBAR SPINES; ORTHOTROPIC MATERIALS;

BONE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0030630673     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-884-7-157     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Ashman, R. B., Rho, J. Y. and Turner, C. H. (1989) Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J. Biomechanics 22, 895-900.
2. Amtmann, E. (1968) The distribution of breaking strength in the human femur shaft. J. Biomechanics 1, 271-277.
3. Behrens, J. C., Walker, P. S. and Shoji, H. (1974) Variations in strength and structure of cancellous bone at the knee. J. Biomechanics 7, 201-207
4. Carter, D. R. and Hayes, W. C. (1977) The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Jt Surg. 59, 954-962.
5. Evans, F. G. (1973) Mechanical properties of bone. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.
6. Gibson, L. J. (1985) The mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics 18, 317-328.
7. Goldstein, S. A. (1987) The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J. Biomechanics 20, 1055-1061.
8. Keller, T. S., Hansson, T. H., Abram, A. C., Spengler, D. M., and Panjabi, M. M. (1989) Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumbar vertebral trabeculae: Effects of disc degeneration. Spine 14, 1012-1019.
9. Martens, R. B. and Ishida, J. (1989) The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density and mineralization on bone strength. J. Biomechanics 22, 419-426.
10. Rice, J. C., Cowin, S. C. and Bowman, J. A. (1988) On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J. Biomechanics 21, 155-168.
11. Sedlin, E. D. and Hirsch, C. (1966) Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthop. Scand. 37, 29-48.
12. Saulgozis Y. Z., Knets I. V., Yanson A., Pfafrod G. O. (1971) Investigation of the non uniform distribution of the elastic and strength characteristics of the cross section of the diaphysis of the human tibia. Polymer Mechanics 7, 837-842.
13. Townsend, P. R., Rauz, P., Rose, R. M., Miegel, R. E., and Radin, E. L. (1975) The distribution and anisotropy of the stiffness of cancellous bone in the human patella. J. Biomechanics 8, 363-367