Bayesian Adaptive Alignment and Inference

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, ISMB 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 358-368

  Zhu, Jun ^a   Liu, Jun ^b   Lawrence, Charles ^a  

^a WADSWORTH CENTER   (United States)

^b STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; INFERENCE ENGINES;

ADAPTIVE ALIGNMENT; BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN EVIDENCE; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; GAP PENALTIES; NORMALIZING CONSTANTS; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; RECURSIVE ALGORITHMS; SCORING MATRIX; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS;

ALIGNMENT;

ELONGATION FACTOR; ELONGATION FACTOR TU;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASE-LINKED ELONGATION FACTORS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDE ELONGATION FACTOR TU; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0030629565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Agrawal, R. and States, D. J. 1996. A Bayesian evolutionary distance for parametrically alignment sequences. J. Comp. Biol. 3(1):1-17.
2. AUison, L., Wallace, C. S., and Yee, C. N. 1992. Finite-state models in the alignment of macromolecules. /. Mol. Evol. 35:77-90.
3. Altschul, S. F. 1991. Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective. /. Moi Biol. 219:555-565.
4. Altschul, S. F. 1993. A protein alignment scoring system sensitive at aU evolutionary distances. /. Mol. Evol. 36:290-300.
5. Box GJEJ». 1980. Sampling and Bayesian inference in scientific modelling and robustness. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 143:383-430.
6. Casella, G., Berger, Ri. 1987 Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentisi evidence in the one-sided testing problem. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. Vol. 82, 106-111.
7. Collins, J J'., Coulson, A J.W., and Lyall, A. 1988. The significance of protein sequence similarities. Comput. Appi. Biosci. 4:67-71.
8. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stan, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. eds. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. New York: Chapman HaU.
9. Liu, J.S. and Lawrence, CE. 1995. Statistical models for multiple sequence alignment: unifications and generalizations. In Proc. Amer. Statist Assoc., Statistical Computing Section, 21:1-8. Orlando, FL: ASA Press.
10. Needleman, S.B. and Wunsch CD. 1970. A general method applicable to the search fro similarities in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. /. Mol. Biol. 48:443-453.
11. Pearson, W.R. 1995. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases. Protein Science 4:1145-1160.
12. Sankoff, D. 1972. Matching sequences under deletion insertion constraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:4-6.
13. Schwartz, R.M. and Dayhoff, M.O. 1978. Matrices for detecting distant relationships. In: Dayhoff, M.O. (ed) Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol. 5, suppl. 3. Natl. Biomed. Res. Found, Washington, pp.353-358.
14. Smith, TJ. and Waterman, M.S 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147:195-197.
15. States, D. J., Harris, E. L., and Hunter, L. 1993. Computaiionally efficient cluster representation in molec-ular sequence megaclassification. In Proc. ISMB93. 1: 387-394. Bethesda, MD: AAAl Press.
16. Thome, J., Kishino, H., and Felsenstein, J. 1991. An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequences. /. Mol. Evol. 33:114-124.
17. Thome, J., Kishino, H., and Felsenstein, J. 1992. Inching toward reality: An improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. /. Mol. Evol. 34,:3-16.
18. Waterman, M.S., Eggert, M., and Lander, E. 1992. Parametric sequence comparisons. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6098-6093.
19. Waterman, M.S. 1994. Parametric and ensemble sequence alignment algorithms. Bull. Math. Biol. 56:743-767.
20. Zhu, J., Liu, J.S. and Lawrence, CE. 1997 Bayesian adaptive alignment algorithms. Forthcoming.