Extraction of well-fitting substructures: Root-mean-square deviation and the difference distance matrix

Folding and Design

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages

  Lesk, Arthur M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; MATHEMATICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0030628746     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00057-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jones, T.A. & Thirup, S. (1986). Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 5, 819-822.
2. Tramontano, A. & Lesk, A.M. (1995). Common features of the conformations of antigen-binding loops in immunoglobulins and application to modelling of loop conformations by data base screening. Proteins 13, 231-245.
3. Rustici M. & Lesk, A.M. (1994). Three-dimensional searching for recurrent structural motifs in databases of protein structures J. Comp. Biol. 1, 121-132.
4. Nichols, W.L, Rose, G.D., Ten Eyck, L.F. & Zimm, B.H. (1995). Rigid domains in proteins: an algorithmic approach to their identification. Proteins 23, 38-48.
5. Lesk, A.M. (1995). Three-dimensional pattern matching in protein structure analysis. In Combinatorial Pattern Matching. (Galil, Z. & Ukkonen, E., eds.), pp. 248-260, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 937, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Taylor, W. & Orengo, C. (1989). Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 208, 1-22.
7. Vriend, G. & Sander, C. (1991). Detection of common three-dimensional substructures in proteins. Proteins 11, 52-58.
8. Alexandrov, N.M., Takahashi, K. & Go, N. (1992). Common spatial arrangement of backbone fragments in homologous and non-homologous proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 225, 5-9.
9. Holm, L. & Sander, C. (1993). Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123-138.
10. Mitchell, E.M., Artymiuk, P.J., Rice, D.W. & Willett, P. (1989). Use of techniques derived from graph theory to. compare secondary structure motifs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 212, 151-166.
11. Lesk, A.M. (1995). Systematic representation of protein folding patterns. J. Mol. Graphics 13, 159-164.
12. Golub, G. & Van Loan, C. (1989). Matrix Computations, edn 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Lesk, A.M. (1994). Computational molecular biology. In Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, 31. (Kent, A. & Williams, J. G. eds.), pp. 101-165, Marcel Dekker, New York.
14. Maiorov, V.N. & Crippen, G.M. (1994). Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 625-634.
15. Gassner, N.C., Baase, W.A. & Matthews, B.W. (1996). A test of the "jigsaw puzzle" model for protein folding by multiple methionine substitutions within the core of T4 lysozyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12155-12158.
16. Chothia, C. & Gerstein, M. (1997). How far can sequences diverge? Nature 385, 579-581.
17. Alt, H, Mehlhorn, K., Wagener, H. & Welzl, E. (1988). Congruence, similarity, and symmetries of geometric objects. Discrete Comput. Geom. 3, 237-256.
18. Imai, K., Sumino, S. & Imai, H. (1989). Minimax geometric fitting of two corresponding sets of points. Proc. 5th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, ACM Press, New York.