Public versus Business Administration: Are They Still Alike in Unimportant Ways?

Administration in Social Work

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 81-98

  Gummer, Burton ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRICULUM; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; UNITED STATES;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CURRICULUM; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; INCOME; LEADERSHIP; NEGOTIATING; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030628520     PISSN: 03643107     EISSN: 15444376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J147v21n02_06     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Golembiewski, R.T. (1996). The future of public administration: End of a short stay in the sun? Or a new day a-dawning? Public Administration Review, 55(2), 139-148
2. Helgesen, S, (1990). Female advantage: Women's ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday
3. Mintzberg, H. (1996a). Musings on management. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 61-67
4. Mintzberg, H. (1996b). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 75-83
5. Riccucci, N.M. (1995a). “Execucrats,” politics, and public policy: What are the ingredients for successful performance in the federal government? Public Administration Review, 55(3), 219-230
6. Riccucci, N.M. (1995b). Unsung heroes: Federal execucrats making a difference. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press
7. Seeley, J.R. et al. (1957). Community Chest: A case study in philanthropy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
8. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222