Cardiovascular and electrocardiographic effects of iopentol in left ventricular angiography: Comparison of the low-osmolar, non-ionic iopentol (Imagopaque® 350) and the hyper-osmolar, ionic metrizoate meglumine-Na-Ca (Isopaque® Coronar 370) in patients with coronary heart disease

European Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 4, 1997, Pages

  Vik Mo, H ^a   Danielsen, R ^b   Skinningsrud, K ^c   Haider, T ^c   Bjerkhaug, A ^d  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Iceland)

^c NYCOMED IMAGING AS   (Norway)

^d NONE   (Norway)

Author keywords

Contrast medium; Haemodynamics; Iopentol; Left ventricular function; Metrizoate

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; IOPENTOL; MEGLUMINE METRIZOATE; METRIZOIC ACID;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY DISEASE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; METRIZOATE; MIDDLE AGED; SAFETY; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0030626271     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/pl00006885     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American College of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Committee (1993) Use of nonionic or low osmolar contrast agents in cardiovascular procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 269-273
2. Feldman RL, Jalowiec DA, Hill JA, Lambert CR (1988) Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using Hexabrix or Renografin in high-risk patients. Am J Cardiol 61: 1334-1337
3. Armstrong SJ, Murphy KP, Wilde P, Hartnell GG (1989) Ventricular fibrillation in coronary angiography: What is the role of contrast medium? Eur Heart J 10: 892-895
4. Matthai WH, Hirshfeld JW (1991) Choice of contrast agents for cardiac angiography: Review and recommendations based on clinically important distinctions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 22: 278-289
5. Holtz E, Michelet ÅA (1990) Iopentol - Safety evaluation of a non-ionic radiographic contrast medium. In: Lærum F, Kendall B (eds) lopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Excerpta Medica, Int Congr Series 909, Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 1-7
6. Almén T, Bååth L (1987) Selective injection of iopentol, iohexol and metrizoate into the left coronary artery of dogs. Induction of ventricular fibrillation and decrease of aortic pressure. Acta Radiol (Suppl) 370: 65-68
7. Almén T, Bååth L (1987) Effects of iopentol, iohexol and metrizoate on the contractility of the isolated rabbit heart. Acta Radiol (Suppl) 370: 61-64
8. Andrew E, Sveen K, Lambrechts M, Lillevold PE (1990) Total iopentol profile - overall results from clinical trials. In: Lærum F, Kendall B (eds) Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Excerpa Medica, Int Congr Series 909. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 117-125
9. Goss JE, Brinker JA (1990) Iopentol in cardioangiography. A randomized double-blind study of iopentol versus iohexol In: Lærum F, Kendall B (eds) Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Excerpta Medica, Int Congr Series 909. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 145-148
10. Sortland O, Johansen JG, Øksendal AN, Waaler A (1992) Iopentol in urography. A clinical comparison between iopentol and metrizoate including delayed reactions. Acta Radiol 33: 368-373
11. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Baxley WA, Hawley RR (1966) Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. Am J Cardiol 18: 10-24
12. Chuck LHS, Refsum H, Rouleau JL, Mathey D, Sievers RE, Parmley WW (1984) Direct pharmacologic and osmolal effects of contrast media on the mechanics of the heart muscle isolated from cats. Am Heart J 108: 97-104
13. Dawson P (1989) Cardiovascular effects of contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 64: 2E-9E
14. Koeda T, Motegi I, Ichikawa T, Suzuki T, Kato M (1987) Changes in hemodynamics due to the contrast medium during left ventriculography. Angiography 38: 825-832
15. Hine AL, Lui D, Dawson P (1985) Contrast media osmolality and plasma volume changes. Acta Radiol 26: 753-756
16. Vik-Mo H, Rosland GA, Følling M, Danielsen R (1988) Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic consequences of high- and low-osmolality contrast agents for left ventricular angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 14: 143-149
17. Slutsky R, Higgins C, Costello D, Hooper W, LeWinter MM (1983) Mechanism of increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after contrast ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 106: 107-113
18. Kløw NE, Refsum H, Hevrøy O, Smiseth OA (1990) Effect of intracoronary contrast medium on left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationships. Am Heart J 118: 59-63
19. Newell JD, Schmidt W, Higgins CB (1979) Effects of intracoronary administration of contrast materials on left ventricular dimensions and rate of relaxation. Invest Radiol 14: 233-238
20. Gerber KH, Higgins CB, Yuh YS, Koziol JA (1982) Regional myocardial hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media in normal and ischemic states. Circulation 65: 1307-1313
21. Serizawa T, Vogel WM, Apstein CS, Grossman W (1981) Comparison of acute alterations in left ventricular relaxation and diastolic chamber stiffness induced by hypoxia and ischemia. J Clin Invest 68: 91-102
22. Tani M, Handa S, Noma S et al. (1985) Changes of left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: A comparison with iopamidol and urografin. Am Heart J 110: 617-622
23. Gaasch WH, Blaustein AS, Andries CW, Donahue RP, Avitall B (1980) Myocardial relaxation. II. Hemodynamic determinants of rate of left ventricular isovolumetric pressure decline. Am J Physiol 239: H1-H9
24. Singh BN (1989) When is QT prolongation antiarrhythmic and when is it proarrhythmic? (Editorial) Am J Cardiol 63: 867-869
25. Murdock DK, Euler DE, Becker DM, Murdock JD, Scanlon PJ, Gunnar RM (1985) Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography. An analysis of mechanisms. Am Heart J 109: 265-273
26. Manhire AR, Dawson P, Dennet R (1984) Contrast agent-induced emesis. Clin Radiol 35: 369-370
27. Hill JA, Winniford M, Cohen MB et al. for the lohexol Cooperative Study (1993) Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. Am J Cardiol 72: 770-775
28. Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, Vavasour HM, O'Dea F, Kent G, Stone E (1992) A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 326: 431-436
29. Gertz EW, Wisneski JA, Miller R et al. (1992) Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: A prospective randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 899-906
30. Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR et al. (1992) Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients ungergoing cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 326: 425-430