Material optimisation of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis based on the fatigue notch fatigue approach

Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 83-98

  Hedia, H S ^b   Barton, D C ^a   Fisher, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Bone resorption; Fatigue notch factor; Finite element analysis; Hip prosthesis; Optimisation

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE CEMENTS; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0030625744     PISSN: 09592989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/bme-1997-7201     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. H.S. Hedia, D.C. Barton, J. Fisher and A. Ibrahim, Shape optimisation of Charnley prosthesis based on fatigue notch factor, Journal of Biomedical Materials and Engineering 6 (1996), 199-217.
2. R. Huiskes and E.Y.-S. Chao, A survey of finite element methods in orthopaedic biomechanics: the first decade, J. Biomechanics 16 (1983), 385-409.
3. R. Huiskes and R. Boeklagen, Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design, J. Biomechanics 22(8/9) (1989), 793-804.
4. J.H. Kuiper and R. Huiskes, Numerical optimization of hip-prosthetic stem material, in: Recent Advances in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, J. Middleton and G.N. Pand, eds, 1992.
5. J.H. Kuiper and R. Huiskes, Numerical optimization of shape and materials, in: Second World Congress of Biomechanics, Abstracts, Vol. II, Leendert Blankevoort and G.M. Jan, eds, Kooloos, 1994.
6. A. Rotem, The effect of implant material properties on the performance of a hip joint replacement, J. of Medical Engineering and Technology 18(6) (1994), 208-217.
7. R. Huiskes and R. Boeklagen, The application of numerical shape optimization to artificial joint design, in: Computational Methods in Bioengineering, R.L. Spiker and B.R. Simon, eds, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1988, pp. 185-197.
8. R.B. Heywood, Designing Against Fatigue, Chapman and Hall, London, 1962.
9. R.C. Rice, ed., Fatigue Design Handbook, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1988.
10. H. Neuber, Theoretical determination of fatigue strength at stress concentration, Technical Report AFML-TR-68-20, 1968.
11. G. Sines and J.L. Waisman, eds, Metal Fatigue, McGraw-Hill, 1959.
12. D.V. Nelson and D.F. Socie, Crack initiation and propagation approaches to fatigue analysis, in: Design of Fatigue and Structure Resistant Structures, P.R. Abelkis and C.M. Hudson, eds, ASTM, 1982, pp. 273-289.
13. M. Fanni, E. Schnack and J. Grunwald, Lifetime maximization through shape optimization of dynamically loaded machine parts, Int. J. Engineering Analysis and Design 1 (1994), 25-41.
14. R.J. Yang, K.K. Choi, R.D. Crowninshield and R.A. Brand, Design sensitivity analysis, a new method for implant design and a comparison with parametric finite analysis, J. Biomechanics 17 (1984), 849-854.
15. H.S. Hedia, D.C. Barton, J. Fisher and T.T. Elmidany, Effect of FE idealisation, load conditions and interface assumptions on the stress distribution and fatigue notch factor in the human femur with an endoprostheses, Journal of Biomedical Materials and Engineering 6 (1996), 135-152.
16. Analyze™ Software, Version 6.2, Biomedical Imaging Resource Mayo Foundation Supplied by CNSoftware Ltd., 1992.
17. A. Rohlmann, U. Mosser and G. Bergmann, Finite element analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis, J. Biomechanics 16 (1983), 727-742.
18. ANSYS, User's manual for revision 5.0, 1992.