Reviewing the value of clinical audit: Is now the time for a change?

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 76-79

  Lester, Howard R ^a   Alderslade, Richard ^b   Thompson, Anthony ^c  

^a DIALnet plc   (United Kingdom)

^b WHO REGIONAL OFFICE FOR EUROPE   (Denmark)

^c Latterly of Secta Consultancy Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL AUDIT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONFIDENTIALITY; EVALUATION STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL AUDIT; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0030623812     PISSN: 09526862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09526869710166987     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Department of Health, Report of the Chief Medical Officer, HMSO, London, 1991.
2. Hopkins, A., Measuring the Quality of Medical Care, Royal College of Physicians, London, 1990.
3. Black, N. and Thompson, E., "Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak", Social Sciences in Medicine, 1993.
4. Secretaries of State for Health, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Medical Audit, Working Paper 6, HMSO, London, 1989.
5. Kolb, D.A., Experimental Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
6. Harman, D. and Martin, G., Medical Audit and the Manager, Birmingham University Health Services Management Centre, 1991.