Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 37, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 109-113

  Palmer, James F ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Landscape perception; Perceived change; Perceived classes; Scenic value

Indexed keywords

GADUS MORHUA;

ENVIRONMENTAL PERCEPTION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; PERCEPTION; SCENIC VALUES;

USA, MASSACHUSETTS, CAPE COD;

EID: 0030620158     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00375-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Balling, J.D. and J.H. Falk, 1982. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environ. Behav., 14: 5-28.
2. Bishop, I.D. and Hulse, D.W., 1994. Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape Urb. Plann., 30(1): 59-70.
3. Carlson, A.A., 1977. On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty. Landscape Plann., 4(2): 131-172.
4. Chandler, G.B., 1976. Natural and Visual Resources, Dennis, Massachusetts. Dennis Conservation Commission and Planning Board, Dennis, MA.
5. Forman, R.T.T., 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol., 10(3): 133-142.
6. Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York, 340 pp.
7. Palmer, J.F., 1976. Numerical and perceptual landscape classification. In: E.H. Zube (Editor), Studies in Landscape Perception. The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
8. Palmer, J.F., 1978. An investigation of the conceptual classification of landscapes and its application to landscape planning issues. In: S. Weidemann and J.R. Anderson (Editors), Priorities for Environmental Design Research. Environmental Design Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 92-103.
9. Palmer, J.F., 1983. Assessment of coastal wetlands in Dennis, Massachusetts. In: R.C. Smardon (Editor), The Future of Wetlands: Assessing Visual-Cultural Values. Allanheld, Osmun Publishers, Totowa, NJ, pp. 65-79.
10. Palmer, J.F., Alonso, S., Dong-hee, K., Gury, J., Hermandez, Y., Ohno, R., Oneto, G., Pogacnik, A. and Smardon, R., 1990. A multi-national study assessing perceived visual impacts. Impact Assessment Bull., 8(4): 31-48.
11. Ribe, R.G., 1982. On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty - a response. Landscape Plann., 9(1): 61-74.
12. Riitters, K.H., O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B. and Jackson, B.L., 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol., 10(1): 23-39.
13. Vining, J. and Stevens, J.J., 1986. The assessment of landscape quality: major methodological considerations. In: R.C. Smardon, J.F. Palmer and J.P. Felleman (Editors), Foundations for Visual Project Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
14. Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G. and Anderson, T.W., 1974. Perception and Measurement of Scenic Resources on the Southern Connecticut River Valley. The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
15. Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L. and Taylor, J.G., 1982. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Plann., 9(1): 1-33.
16. Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G. and Evans, G.W., 1983. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. J. Environ. Psychol., 3: 115-128.