Regional patterns of mussel species distributions in North American rivers

Ecography

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 107-115

  Vaughn, Caryn C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ENDANGERED BIVALVE; MUSSEL;

NORTH AMERICA;

BIVALVIA;

EID: 0030618978     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00352.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ahlstedt, S. A. 1983. The molluscan fauna of the Elk River in Tennessee and Alabama. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 1: 43-50.
2. Angermeier, P. L. and Schlosser, I. J. 1989. Species-area relationships for stream fishes. - Ecology 70: 1450-1462.
3. Anonymous 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. - United States Federal Register, 20 August 1994.
4. Bauer, G., Hochwald, S. and Wilkenat, W. 1991. Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels: the role of host fish and metabolic rate. - Freshw. Biol. 26: 377-386.
5. Bock, C. E. and Ricklefs, R. E. 1983. Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: a positive correlation. - Am. Nat. 122: 295-299.
6. Bogan, A. E. 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionidae): a search for causes. - Am. Zool. 33: 599-609.
7. Brönmark, C. and Malmqvist, B. 1982. Resource partitioning between unionid mussels in a Swedish lake outlet. - Holarct. Ecol. 5: 389-395.
8. Brown, J. H. and Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445-449.
9. Caswell, H. and Cohen, J. E. 1991. Disturbance, interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 193-218.
10. Clark, C. F. 1987. The freshwater Naiads of Ohio, part V, Wabash River drainage of Ohio. - Malacol. Data Net 2: 19-37.
11. Collins, S. L., Glenn, S. M. and Roberts, D. W. 1993. The hierarchical continuum concept. - J. Veg. Sci. 4: 149-156.
12. Cornell, H. V. 1993. Unsaturated patterns in species assemblages: the role of regional processes in setting local species richness. - In: Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 243-252.
13. _ and Lawton, J. H. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. - J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 1-12.
14. Cummings, K. S., Buchanan, A. C. and Koch, L. M. (ed), 1993. Conservation and management of freshwater mussels. Proc. UMRCC symp., 12-14 Oct. 1992. St. Louis, Missouri. - Upper Mississippi River conservation committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
15. Cutler, A. 1991. Nested faunas and extinction in fragmented habitats. - Conserv. Biol. 5: 496-505.
16. Davis, G. J. and Howe, R. W. 1992. Juvenile dispersal, limited breeding sites, and the dynamics of metapopulations. -Theor. Pop. Biol. 41: 184-207.
17. Dennis, S. D. 1984. Distributional analysis of the freshwater mussel fauna of the Tennessee River system, with special reference to possible limiting effects of siltation. - PhD. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Inst., Blacksburg, Virginia.
18. Faeth, S. H. 1984. Density compensation in vertebrates and invertebrates: a review and an experiment. - In: Strong, D. R., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. G. and Thistle, A. B. (eds), Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 491-509.
19. Gordon, M. E. 1985. Mollusca of Frog Bayou, Arkansas. -Nautilus 99: 6-9.
20. Gotelli, N. J. 1991. Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the core-satellite hypothesis. -Am. Nat. 138: 768-776.
21. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. - Oikos 38: 210-221.
22. Harmon, J. L. 1989. Freshwater bivalve mollusks (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Graham Creek, a small southeastern Indiana stream. - Malacol. Data Net 2: 113-121.
23. _ 1992. Naiades (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Sugar Creek, East Fork White River Drainage, in central Indiana. - Malacol. Data Net 3: 31-42.
24. Harris, J. L. 1992. Survey of the freshwater mussels of the South Fourche La Fave River and major tributaries. -Arkansas Game and Fish Div., USA.
25. Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 73-88.
26. Haskin, H. H. 1954. Age determination in mollusks. - Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 16: 300-304.
27. Hartfield, P. and Ebert, D. 1986. The mussels of southwest Mississippi streams. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 4: 21-23.
28. Kat, P. W. 1982. Effects of population density and substratum type on growth and migration of Elliptio complanata (Bivalvia: Unionidae). - Malacol. Rev. 15: 119-127.
29. _ 1984. Parasitism and the Unionacea (Bivalvia). - Biol. Rev. 9: 189-207.
30. _ and Davis, G. M. 1984. Molecular genetics of peripheral populations of Nova Scotian Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22: 157-185.
31. Kolasa, J. 1989. Ecological systems in hierarchical perspective: breaks in community structure and other consequences. -Ecology 70: 36-47.
32. MacArthur, R. H., Diamond, J. M. und Karr, J. R. 1972. Density compensation in island faunas. - Ecology 53: 330-342.
33. McMahon, R. F. 1991. Mollusca: Bivalvia. - In: Thorp, J. H. and Covich, A. P. (eds), Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, pp. 315-400.
34. Mehlhop, P. and Vaughn, C. C. 1994. Threats to and sustainability of ecosystems for freshwater mollusks. - In: Covington, W. and Dehand, L. F. (eds), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management. General Tech. Rep. Rm-247 Rocks Mountain Range and Forest Exp. Stat. U.S. Forest Serv., Fort Collins, CO, pp. 68-77.
35. Nee, S., Gregory, R. D. and May, R. M. 1991. Core and satellite species: theory and artifacts. - Oikos. 62: 83-89.
36. Neves, R. J. 1993. A state-of-the-unionids address. - In: Cummings, K. S., Buchanan, A. C. and Koch, L. M. (eds), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels. Proc. UMRCC symp., 12-14, Oct. 1992, St. Louis, Missouri, Upper Mississippi River conservation committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 1-10.
37. Neves, R. J., and Widlak, J. C. 1987. Habitat ecology of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 5: 1-7.
38. Patterson, B. D. 1987. The principle of nested subsets and its implications for biological conservation. - Conserv. Biol. 1: 247-293.
39. _ and Atmar, W. 1986. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. - In: Heany, L. R. and Patterson, B. D. (eds), Island biogeographs of mammals. Biol. J Linn. Soc. 28. Academic Press, pp. 65-82.
40. _ and Brown, J. H. 1991. Regionally nested patterns of species composition in granivorous rodent assemblages. -J. Biogeogr. 18: 395-402.
41. Payne, B. S. and Miller, A. C. 1989. Growth and survival of recent recruits to a population of Fusconaia ebena (Bivalvia: Mollusca) in the lower Ohio River. - Am. Midl. Nat. 121: 99-104.
42. Richardson, J. B. 1989. Distribution, abundance and community structure of freshwater mussels within the Big South Fork National River and recreation area. - MS-thesis, Tennessee Techn. Univ., USA.
43. Salmon, A. and Green, R. H. 1982. Environmental determinants of unionid clam distribution in the Middle Thames River. Ontario. - Can. J. Zool. 61: 832-838.
44. Schanzle, R. W. and Cummings, K. S. 1991. A survey of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Sangamon River Basin, Illinois. - Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv. Biol. Not. 137.
45. Schmidt, J. E. and Zeto, M. A. 1986. Naiad distribution in the Mud River drainage, southwestern West Virginia. - Malacol. Data Net 1: 69-77.
46. _, Estes, R. D. and Gordon, M. E. 1989. Historical changes in the mussel fauna (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Stones River, Tennessee. - Malacol. Rev. 22: 47-53.
47. Smith, D. G. 1985. Recent range expansion of the freshwater mussel. Anodonta implicata, and its relationship to clupeid fish restoration in the Connecticut river system. - Freshwat. Invertebr. Biol. 4: 105-108.
48. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Co.
49. Starnes, L. B. and Bogan, A. E. 1988. The mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Tennessee. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 6: 19-38.
50. Stern, E. M. 1983. Depth distribution and density of freshwater mussels collected with scuba from the lower Wisconsin and St. Croix rivers. - Nautilus 97: 36-42.
51. Strayer, D. L. 1980. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Clinton River, Michigan, with comments on man's impact on the fauna. - Nautilus 94: 142-149.
52. _ 1983. Effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, USA. - Freshw. Biol. 13: 253-264.
53. _ and Ralley, J. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia), including two rare species of Alasmidonta. - J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 12: 247-258.
54. _, Hunter, D. C., Smith, L. C. and Borg, C. K. 1994. Distribution, abundance, and roles of freshwater clams (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in the freshwater tidal Hudson River. - Freshw. Biol. 31: 239-248.
55. Thomas, C. D. 1994. Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. - Conserv. Biol. 8: 373-378.
56. Vannote, R. L. and Minshall, G. W. 1982. Fluvial processes and local lithology controlling abundance, structure, and composition of mussel beds. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79: 4103-4107.
57. Vaughn, C. C. 1993. Can biogeographic models be used to predict the persistence of mussel populations in rivers? -In: Cummings, K. S., Buchanan, A. C. and Koch, L. M. (eds), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels. Proc. UMRCC symposium. 12-14 Oct. 1992. St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River conservation committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 117-122.
58. _ and Pyron, M. 1995. Population ecology of the endangered Ouachita Rock Pocketbook Mussel, Arkansia wheeleri (Bivalvia: Unionacea), in the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 11: 145-151.
59. _ and Taylor, C. M. 1995. Macroecology of a host-parasite relationship: congruent distribution patterns of mussels and their fish hosts. - Bull. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 12: 99.
60. _, Taylor, C. M. and Eberhard, K. J. 1996. A comparison of the effectiveness of timed searches vs. quadrat samples in mussel surveys. - Conserv. Manage. Freshw. Mussels. Proc. UMRCC symp., 16-18 Oct. 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River conservation committee, Rock Island, Illinois, in press.
61. Warren, M. L., Cicerello, D. R., Camburn, K. E. and Fallo, G. J. 1984. The longitudinal distribution of the freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of Kinniconick Creek, northeastern Kentucky. - Am. Malacol. Bull. 3: 47-53.
62. Walters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. - J. Biogeogr. 19: 481-490.
63. _ 1994. An annotated bibliography of the reproduction and propagation of the Unionoidea (primarily of North America). - Ohio Biol. Surv. Misc. Contrib. No. 1.
64. Way, C. M. 1988. An analysis of life histories in freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Pisidiidae). - Can. J. Zool. 66: 1179-1183.
65. _, Miller, A. C. and Payne, B. S. 1989. The influence of physical factors on the distribution and abundance of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the lower Tennessee River. - Nautilus 103: 96-98.
66. Wright, D. H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. - J. Biogeogr. 18: 463-466.
67. and Reeves, J. H. 1992. On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages. - Oecologia 92: 416-428.
68. Wright, S. J. 1980. Density compensation in island avifaunas. - Oecologia 45: 385-389.