Gene flow and establishment of transgenes in natural plant populations

Acta Botanica Neerlandica

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-84

  Van Raamsdonk, L W D ^a   Schouten, H J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Beta; biosafety; Daucus; establishment; fitness; gene flow; introgression; population size; transgenic plants

Indexed keywords

GENE FLOW; PLANT POPULATION; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

EID: 0030616989     PISSN: 00445983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/plb.1997.46.1.69     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Abegg, F.A. (1936): A genetic factor for the annual habit in beets and linkage relationship. J. Agr. Res. 53: 493-511.
2. Andow, D.A. (1994): Community response to transgenic plant release: using mathematical theory to predict effects of transgenic plants. Mol. Ecol. 3: 65-70.
3. Aylor, D.E. (1986): A framework for examining inter-regional aerial transport of fungal spores. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38: 263-288.
4. Banga, O. (1976): Carrot, Daucus carota (Umbelliferae). IN: Simmonds, N.W. (ed.): Evolution of Crop Plants, pp. 291-293, Longman, London and New York.
5. Bartsch, D., Pohl-Orf, M., Schmidt, M. & Schuphan, I. (1995): Naturalization of transgenic (BNYV-virus resistant) sugar beets in agricultural and non-agricultural areas. Paper presented at the Symposium for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants, Monterey, California.
6. Bartsch, D., Schmidt, M., Pohl-Orf, M., Haag, C. & Schuphan, I. (1996): Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 5: 199-205.
7. Bosemark, N.O. (1993): Sugar beet. In: Traditional crop breeding practices: an historical review to serve as a baseline for assessing the role of modern biotechnology, pp. 123-136, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
8. Boudry, P., Mörchen, M., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Vernet, Ph. & Dijk, H. van (1993): The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theor. Appl. Gen. 87: 471-478.
9. Brandenburg, W.A. (1981): Possible relationships between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.) in the Netherlands. Kulturpflanze 29: 369-375.
10. Campbell, G.K.G. (1976): Sugar beet, Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae). In: Simmonds, N.W. (ed.): Evolution of Crop Plants, pp. 25-28, Longman, London and New York.
11. Crawley, M.J. (1993): Arm-chair risk assessment [Correspondence]. Biol Technology 11: 1496.
12. Crawley, M.J., Hails, R.S., Rees, M., Kohn, D. & Buxton, J. (1993): Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620-623.
13. Crawley, M.J. (1994): Risk assessment redux - reply. Biol Technology 12: 217.
14. Dale, J.M. (1974): The biology of Canadian weeds. 5. Daucus carota. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54: 673-685.
15. Dale, P. (1994): The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: general considerations. Mol. Ecol. 3: 31-36.
16. De Jong, M.D., Scheepens, P.C. & Zadoks, J.C. (1990): Risk analysis applied to biological control of a forest weed, using a Gaussian plume model. Grana 29: 139-145.
17. De Jong, M.D., Wagenmakers, P.S. & Goudriaan, J. (1991): Modelling the escape of Chondrostereum purpureum spores from a larch forest with biological control of Prunus serotina. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 97: 55-61.
18. De Vries, F.T., Meijden, R. van der & Brandenburg, W.A. (1992): Botanical files: a study of the real chances for spontaneous gene flow from cultivated plants to the wild flora of the Netherlands. Gorteria suppl 1, Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, Leiden.
19. Dobzhansky, Th., Ayala, F.J., Stebbins, G.L. & Valentine, J.W. (1977): Evolution. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
20. Eijlander, R. (1989): Transgene biet, ja of nee. In: de Gier, A.M. & Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. (eds.): Risico-analyse van transgene planten in de praktijk. Supplement Prophyta 43: 232-233.
21. Ellstrand, N.C. & Hoffman, C.A. (1990): Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. Strategies for risk reduction. Bioscience 40: 438-442.
22. Evans, A. & Weir, J. (1981): The evolution of weed beet in sugar beet crops. Kulturpflanze 29: 301-310.
23. Fisher, R. (1937): The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann. Eugenics 7: 355-369.
24. Fitt, B.D.L. & McCartney, H.A. (1986): Spore dispersal in relation to epidemic models. In: Leonard, K.J. & Fry, W.E. (eds.): Plant Disease Epidemiology, Vol. 1, pp. 311-345, Macmillan, New York, USA.
25. Ford-Lloyd, B.V. & Hawkes, J.G. (1986): Weed beets: their origin and classification. Acta Hort. 182: 399-402.
26. Fredshavn, J.R., Poulsen, G.S., Huybrechts, I. & Rüdelsheim, P. (1995): Competitiveness of transgenic oilseed rape. Transg. Res. 4: 142-148.
27. Gary, N.E., Witherell, P.C., Lorenzen, K. & Marston, J.M. (1977): The interfield distribution of honey bees on carrots, onions and safflower. Environm. Entomol. 6: 637-640.
28. Gary, N.E., Witherell, P.C. & Marston, J.M. (1972): Foraging and distribution of honey bees used for carrot and onion pollination. Environm. Entomol. 1: 71-78.
29. Gliddon, C. (1994): The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: biological models and theoretical perspectives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 41-44.
30. Gregorius, H.-R. & Steiner, W. (1993): Gene transfer in plants as a potential agent of introgression. In: Wöhrmann, K. & Tomiuk, J. (eds.): Transgenic Organisms, Risk Assessment of Deliberate Release, pp. 83-107, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
31. Hancock, J.F. (1992): Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
32. Hornsey, K.G. & Arnold, M.H. (1979): The origins of weed beet. Ann. Appl. Biol. 92: 279-285.
33. Jensen, I. & Bogh, H. (1941): Om forhold der har Indflydelse paa Krydsningsfarenhos vindbestøvende Kulturplanter. Tidsskr. Planteavl. 46: 238-268.
34. Kareiva, P. (1990): Using models of population spread to analyze the results of field releases. In: Risk Assessment in Agricultural Biotechnology, pp. 168-174. University of California, Oakland.
35. Kareiva, P. (1993): Editorial comment. Nature 363: 580-581.
36. Kareiva, P., Manasse, R. & Morris, W. (1991): Using models to integrate data from field trials and estimate risks of gene escape and gene spread. In: MacKenzie, D.R. & Henry, S.C. (eds.): Biological Monitoring of Genetically Engineered Plants and Microbes, pp. 168-174, Agric. Res. Inst. Bethesda, USA.
37. Kareiva, P., Morris, W. & Jacobi, C.M. (1994): Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 15-21.
38. Klinger, T., Elam, D.R. & Ellstrand, N.C. (1991): Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating. Cons. Biol. 5: 531-535.
39. KNMI (1979): Luchtverontreiniging en weer. De Bilt, Staatsuitgeverij 's-Gravenhage.
40. Lavigne, C. (1994): Les risques associés à la culture de plantes transgébiques résistantes aux herbicides, PhD Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France.
41. Letschert, J.P.W. (1993): Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation and taxonomy. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 93-1: 1-155.
42. Lévêque de Vilmorin, P.P.A. (1886): Notice sur l'amelioration de la carotte sauvage. In: Notices sur l'amelioration des plantes, pp. 5-14. Vilmorin-Andrieux et cie., Paris.
43. Linder, C.R. & Schmitt, J. (1994): Assessing the risks of transgene escape through time and crop-wild hybrid persistence. Mol. Ecol. 3: 23-30.
44. Madsen, K.H. (1994): Weed Management and Impact on Ecology of Growing Glyphosate Tolerant Sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.). PhD Thesis, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
45. Manasse, R. (1992): Ecological risks of transgenic plants: effects of spatial dispersion on gene flow. Ecol. Appl. 2: 431-138.
46. Manasse, R. & Kareiva, P. (1991): Quantifying the spread of recombinant genes and organisms. In: Ginzburg, L. (ed.): Assessing Ecological Risks of Biotechnology, pp. 215-231, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
47. Miller, H.I., Huttner, S.L. & Beachy, R. (1993): Risk assessment experiments for 'genetically modified' plants. BiolTechnology 11: 1323-1324.
48. Miller, H.I., Beachy, R. & Huttner, S.L. (1994): Risk assessment redux [Correspondence]. Biol Technology 12: 216-217.
49. Okubo, A. & Levin, S.A. (1989): A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seeds and pollen. Ecology 70: 329-338.
50. Price, T. & Langen, T. (1992): Evolution of correlated characters. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 307-310.
51. Raybould, A.F. & Gray, A.J. (1993): Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Biol. 30: 199-213.
52. Reboud, X. (1992): Les risques associés aux manipulations génétiques: le cas de la résistance aux herbicides. PhD Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France.
53. Reboud, X. & Till-Bottraud (1991): The cost of herbicide resistance measured by a competition experiment. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 690-696.
54. Regal, P.J. (1994): Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 5-13.
55. Reheul, D. (1987a): Ruimtelijke isolatie in de plantenveredeling. 1. Ruimtelijke isolatie bij windbestuivers. Landbouwtijdschrift 40: 5-14.
56. Reheul, D. (1987b): Ruimtelijke isolatie in de plantenveredeling. 2. Ruimtelijke isolatie bij insektenbestuivers. Landbouwtijdschrift 40: 15-23.
57. Rieseberg, L.H. & Brunsfeld, S.J. (1992): Molecular evidence and plant introgression. In: Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Doyle, J.J. (eds.): Molecular Systematics of Plants, pp. 151-176, Chapman & Hall, New York.
58. St Pierre, M.D. & Bayer, R.J. (1991): The impact of domestication on the genetic variability in the orange carrot, cultivated Daucus carota ssp. sativus and the genetic homogeneity of various cultivars. Theor. Appl. Gen. 82: 249-253.
59. Santoni, S. & Bervillé, A. (1992): Evidence for gene exchanges between sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and wild beets: consequences for transgenic sugar beets. Plant Mol. Biol. 20: 578-580.
60. Schneider, F. (1944): Züchtung der Betarüben. In: Roemer, T. & Rudorf, W. (eds.): Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung 4. Rüben, Kartoffeln, Öl und Gespinstpflanzen, Tabak, pp. 1-96. Paul Parey, Berlin.
61. Small, E. (1978): A numerical taxonomic analysis of the Daucus carota complex. Can. J. Bot. 56: 248-276.
62. Small, E. (1984): Hybridization in the domesticated weed-wild complex. In: Grant, W.F. (ed.): Plant Biosystematics, pp. 195-210, Academic Press, Toronto.
63. Tomiuk, J. & Loeschke, V. (1993): Conditions for the establishment and persistence of populations of transgenic organisms. In: Wöhrmann, K. & Tomiuk, J. (eds.): Transgenic Organisms, Risk Assessment of Deliberate Release, pp. 117-133, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
64. Van den Bosch, F., Zadoks, J.C. & Metz, J.A.J. (1988): Focus expansion in plant disease. I: The constant rate of focus expansion. Phytopathology 78: 54-58.
65. Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. (1986): The grey area between black and white: the choice between botanical code and cultivated code. Acta Hort. 182: 153-158.
66. Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. (1993): Wild and cultivated plants: the parallelism between evolution and domestication. Evol. Trends Pl. 7: 73-84.
67. Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. (1995): The effect of domestication on plant evolution. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 421-438.
68. Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. & Van der Maesen, L.J.G. (1996): Crop-weed complexes: the complex relationship between crop plants and their wild relatives. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 135-155.
69. Wellensiek, S.J. (1943): Grondslagen der algemeene plantenveredeling, Tjeenk Willink en Zoon, Haarlem.
70. Wijnheimer, E.H.M., Brandenburg, W.A. & Ter Borg, S.J. (1989): Interactions between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.) in the Netherlands. Euphytica 40: 147-154.
71. Wilson, H.D. (1990): Gene flow in squash species. Domesticated Cucurbita species may not represent closed genetic systems. Bioscience 40: 449-455.
72. Williamson, M. (1993): Risks from the release of GMOs: ecological and evolutionary considerations. Evol. Trends Plant Environm. Update 1: 5-9.