Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) ecotones in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA

Ecology

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 632-641

  Stohlgren, Thomas J ^a   Bachand, Richard R ^a  

^a Immunology and Pathology   (United States)

Author keywords

9 species environment relationships; Forest distributions; Gradient analysis; Lodgepole pine; Pinus contorta; Vegetation ecotones

Indexed keywords

PINUS CONTORTA; ABIES LASIOCARPA; PICEA ENGELMANNII; PINACEAE; PINUS FLEXILIS; PINUS PONDEROSA;

ECOTONE; ENGELMANN SPRUCE; LIMBER PINE; LODGEPOLE PINE; PONDEROSA PINE; SUBALPINE FIR;

USA, COLORADO, ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK;

EID: 0030616882     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0632:lppcei]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen, R. B., and R. K. Peet. 1990. Gradient analysis of forests of the Sangre de Cristo Range, Colorado, Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 193-201.
2. Allen, R. B., R. K. Peet, and W. L. Baker. 1991. Gradient analysis of latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests. Journal of Biogeography 18: 123-139.
3. Baron, J., editor. 1991. The Loch Vale watershed ecosystem. Ecological Studies Series, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
4. Cochran, P. H., and C. M. Berntsen. 1973. Tolerance of lodgepole and ponderosa pine seedlings to low night temperatures. Forest Science 19: 272-280.
5. Cornelius, J. M., and J. E. Reynolds. 1991. On determining the statistical significance of discontinuities within ordered ecological data. Ecology 72: 2057-2070.
6. Day, R. W., and G. P. Quinn. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59: 433-463.
7. DeLucia, E. H., and W. K. Smith. 1987. Air and soil temperature limitations on photosynthesis in Engelmann spruce during summer. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 527-533.
8. Dewey, D. R., and K. H. Lu. 1959. A correlation and pathcoefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51: 515-518.
9. Franklin, S. B., P. A. Rohertson, J. S. Fralish, and S. M. Kettler. 1993. Overstory vegetation and successional trends of Land Between The Lakes. USA. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 509-520.
10. Gee, G. W., and J. W. Bauder. 1986. Pages 383-411 in A. Klute, editor. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Second edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
11. Gosz, J. R. 1993. Ecotone hierarchies. Ecological Applications 3: 369-376.
12. Hadley, K. S., and T. T. Veblen. 1993. Stand response to western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir hark beetle outbreaks, Colorado Front Range. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 479-491.
13. Hansen, A. J., and F. di Castri, editors. 1992. Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and landscape flows. Ecological Studies 92.
14. Holland, M. M., P. G. Risser, and R. J. Naiman, editors. 1991. Ecotones. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
15. Knight, D. H. 1994. Mountains and plains: the ecology of Wyoming landscapes. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
16. Madole, R. F. 1976. Glacial geology of the Front Range, Colorado, Pages 319-351 in W. C. Mahaney, editor. Quaternary stratigraphy of North America. Dowden, Hutchison and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
17. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1990. Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Third edition. Irwin. Homewood, Illinois, USA.
18. Palmer, M. W. 1993a. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215-2230.
19. _. 1993b. Potential biases in site and species selection for ecological monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26: 277-282.
20. Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45: 3-75.
21. _. 1988. Forests of the Rocky Mountains. Pages 63-101 in M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
22. Prentice, C. 1992. Climate change and long-term vegetation dynamics Pages 293-339 in D. C. Glenn-Lewin, R. A. Peet, and T. T. Veblen, editors. Plant succession: theory and prediction. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
23. Reed, R. A., R. K. Peet, M. W. Palmer, and P. S. White. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 329-340.
24. Risser, P. G. 1993. Ecotones: ecotones at local to regional scales from around the world. Ecological Applications 3: 367-368.
25. _. 1995. The status ot the science of examining ecotones. BioScience 45: 318-325.
26. Rusek, J. 1993. Air-pollution-mediatcd changes in alpine ecosystems and ecotones. Ecological Applications 3: 406-416.
27. SAS. 1990. SAS system. Version 6.01. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
28. Stohlgren, T. J. 1992. Resilience of a heavily logged grove of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Kings Canyon National Park. California, Forest Ecology and Management 54: 115-140.
29. _. 1994. Planning long-term vegetalion studies at landscape scales. Pages 208-241 in T. M. Powell, and J. H. Steele, editors. Ecological time series. Chapman and Hall. New York, New York, USA.
30. _. 1996. The Rocky Mountains. In National Status and Trends Report. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, D.C., in press.
31. Stohlgren, T. J., J. Baron, and T. Kittel. 1993. Understanding coupled climatic, hydrological, and ecosystem responses to global climate change in the Colorado Rockies Biogeographical Area. Pages 184-200 in W. E. Brown and S. D. Veirs. Jr., editors. Partners in Stewardship: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands. George Wright Society, Hancock, Michigan, USA.
32. Stohlgren, T. J., D. Binkley, T. T. Veblen, and W. L. Baker. 1995. Attributes of landscape-scale, long-term studies: malpractice insurance for landscape ecologists. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 36: 1-25.
33. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
34. _. 1987a. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
35. _. 1987b. CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
36. _. 1991. CANOCO version 3.12. Agricultural Mathematics Group. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
37. Veblen, T. T., K. S., Hadley, M. S. Reid, and A. J. Rebertus. 1991a. Stand response to spruce beetle outbreak in Colorado subalpine forests. Ecology 72: 213-231.
38. Veblen, T. T. K. S. Hadley, M. S. Reid, and A. J. Rebertus. 1991b. Methods of detecting past spruce beetle outbreaks in Rocky Mountain subalpine forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 242-254.
39. Villalba, R., T. T. Veblen, and J. Ogden. 1994. Climatic influences on the growth of subalpine trees in the Colorado Front Range. Ecology 75: 1450-1462.
40. Weisberg, P. J., and W. L. Baker. 1995. Spatial variation in tree seedlings and krummholz growth in the forest-tundra ecotone of Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 27: 116-129.
41. Wesser, S. D., and W. S. Armbruster. 1991. Species distribution controls across a forest-steppe transition: a causal model and experimental test. Ecological Monographs 61: 323-342.
42. Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews 42: 207-264.
43. Zar, J. H. 1974. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.