How to measure no effect. Part III: Statistical aspects of NOEC, ECx and NEC estimates

Environmetrics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 255-261

  Van Der Hoeven, Nelly ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

chronic toxicity; ecotoxicity tests; test guidelines

Indexed keywords

ECOTOXICITY TESTING; METHODOLOGICAL COMPARISON; NO OBSERVED EFFECT CONCENTRATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030616538     PISSN: 11804009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199705)8:3<255::AID-ENV246>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bedaux, J. J. M. and Kooijman, S. A. L. M, (1994). 'Statistical analysis of bioassays, based on hazard modelling', Environmental & Ecological Statistics, 1, 303-314.
2. Cox, C. (1987). 'Threshold dose-response models in toxicology', Biometrics, 43, 511-524.
3. EC. (1991). 'Prolonged toxicity study with Daphnia magna: effects on reproduction', EEC Draft guideline XI/681/86, version 4.
4. Hoekstra, J. A. and van Ewijk, P. H. (1993). 'Alternatives for the No-Observed-Effect Level', Environmental and Toxicological Chemistry, 12, 187-194.
5. Pack, S. (1993). 'A review of statistical data analysis and experimental design in OECD aquatic toxicity test guidelines', Shell Research Ltd., Sittingbourne Research Centre, Sittingbourne, Kent.
6. van Ewijk, P. H. and Hoekstra, J. A. (1993). 'Calculation of the ECSO and its confidence interval when subtoxic stimulus is present', Ecotoxicological and Environmental Safety, 25, 25-32.
7. van Straalen, N. M. (1997). 'How to measure no effect. Part II: Threshold effects in ecotoxicology', Environmetrics, 8, 249-253.