Effects of immobilized pectinase on the microfiltration of dilute pectin solutions by macroporous titania membranes: Resistance model interpretation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-76

  Szaniawski, Andrzej R ^a   Spencer, H Garth ^b  

^a WEST POMERANIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bovine serum albumin; Flux enhancement; Immobilized enzyme; Microfiltration; Resistance analysis

Indexed keywords

IMMOBILIZED ENZYME; PECTIN; POLYGALACTURONASE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

APPLE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CITRUS FRUIT; ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; MEMBRANE FILTER; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ENZYMES; MEMBRANES-CERAMIC; MICROFILTRATION;

ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; FILTRATION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOLUTIONS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

MACROPOROUS MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

EID: 0030616151     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00299-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. M. Cheryan, Ultrafiltration Handbook, Technomic, Lancaster, 1986.
2. B.G. Medina and A. Garcia, III, Concentration of orange juice by reverse osmosis, J. Food. Proc. Eng., 10 (1988) 217.
3. Velicangil Ö.J.A. Howell, Protease-coupled membranes for ultrafiltration, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 19 (1977) 1982.
4. J.A. Howell and Ö. Velicangil, Ultrafiltration Membranes and Applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.
5. J.A. Howell and Velicangil Ö., Theoretical considerations of membrane fouling and its treatment with immobilized enzymes for protein ultrafiltration. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 27 (1982) 21.
6. C.Y. Jenq, S.S. Wang and B. Davidson, Ultrafiltration of raw sewage using an immobilized membrane, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2 (1980) 145.
7. V.C. Gekas, Artificial membranes as carriers for the immobilization of biocatalysts, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 8 (1986) 450.
8. J. Chen, L. Wang and Z. Shu, Preparation of enzyme immobilized membranes and their self-cleaning and antifouling abilities in protein separations, Desalination, 86 (1992) 301.
9. R.L. Thomas, D.L. McKamy and H.G. Spencer, in T. Matsuura and S. Sourirajan (Eds.), Advances in Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1989, pp. 563-574.
10. H.J. Wang, R.L. Thomas, A.R. Szaniawski and H.G. Spencer, Enzymes immobilized on formed-in-place membranes for food processing: procedures and properties, J. Food Proc. Eng., 17 (1994) 365.
11. A.R. Szaniawski and H.G. Spencer, Effects of pectin concentration and crossflow velocity on flux in the microfiltration of dilute pectin solutions by macroporous titania membranes containing immobilized pectinase, Biotechnol. Prog., in press.
12. G.L. Robertson, The fractional extraction and quantitative determination of pectic substances in grapes and musts, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 30 (1979) 182.
13. N. Nelson, A photometric adaption of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose, J. Biol. Chem., 153 (1944) 375.
14. K.M. Ko and J.J. Pellegrino, Determination of osmotic pressure and fouling resistance and their effects on performance of ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 74 (1992) 141.
15. G. Belfort, R.H. Davis and A.L. Zydney, The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 96 (1994) 1.
16. M. Pritchard, J.A. Howell and R.W. Field, The ultrafiltration of viscous fluids, J. Membr. Sci., 102 (1995) 223.