An approach for characterizing tropospheric ozone risk to forests

Environmental Management

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 105-120

  Hogsett, William E ^a   Weber, James E ^a   Tingey, David ^a   Herstrom, Andrew ^b   Lee, E Henry ^b   Laurence, John A ^c  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b ManTech Environ Research Laboratory   (United States)

^c Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Forests; GIS; Ozone; Risk characterization; Trees

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; POLLUTANT; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; OZONE LAYER; PLANTS (BOTANY); RISK ASSESSMENT; TROPOSPHERE;

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT;

FORESTRY;

AIR POLLUTION; FOREST; FOREST IMPACT; GIS; OZONE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TREE SPECIES; TROPOSPHERE; TROPOSPHERIC OZONE;

ACER; ACER RUBRUM; ACER SACCHARUM; LIRIODENDRON; LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA; PINUS STROBUS; PINUS TAEDA; PINUS VIRGINIANA; POPULUS BEROLINENSIS; PRUNUS SEROTINA; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR; TULIPA;

EID: 0030615703     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. EarthInfo, Inc. 1992a. EarthInfo's national climatic data center surface airways user's manual. Boulder, Colorado.
2. EarthInfo, Inc. 1992b. EarthInfo's national climatic data center summary of the day user's manual. Boulder, Colorado.
3. Eyre, F. H. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.
4. Hansen, M. H., Frieswyk, T., Glover, J. F., and J. F. Kelly, 1992. The Eastwide forest inventory data base: Users manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-151. USDA, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, 48 pp.
5. Hogsett, W. E., and A. A. Herstrom. 1991. GIS-based risk assessment: Applications from an approach to ozone risk assessment. Pages 36-43 in Plant tier testing: A workshop to evaluate non-target plant testing in subdivion J pesticide guidelines. EPA/600/9-91/041, US EPA, Washington, DC.
6. Hogsett, W. E., D. T. Tingey, and S. R. Holman. 1985. A programmable exposure control system for determination of the effects of pollutant exposure regimes on plant growth. Atmospheric Environment 19:1135-1145.
7. Hogsett, W. E., D. T. Tingey, and E. H. Lee. 1988. Ozone exposure indices: Concepts for development and evaluation of their use. Pages 107-138 in W. W. Heck, O. C. Taylor, and D. T. Tingey (eds.), Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants: Proceedings of an international conference. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
8. Karnosky, D., Z. E. Gagnon, R. E. Dickson, M. D. Coleman, E. H. Lee, and J. G. Isebrands. 1995. Changes in growth, leaf abscission and biomass associated with seasonal ozone exposures of Populus tremuloides clones and seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research (in press).
9. Kormanik, P. P. 1986. Lateral root morphology as an expression of sweetgum seedling quality. Forest Science 32(3):595-604.
10. Kress, L. W., and J. M. Skelly. 1982. Response of several eastern forest tree species to chronic doses of ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Plant Disease 66:1149-1152 (erratum 67:233).
11. Laurence, J. A., R. J. Kohut, and R. G. Amundson. 1993. Use of TREGRO to simulate the effects of ozone on the growth of red spruce seedlings. Forest Science (in press).
12. Lee, E. H., D. T. Tingey, and W. E. Hogsett. 1988. Evaluation of ozone exposure indices in exposure-response modeling. Environmental Pollution 53:43-62.
13. Lee, E. H., W. E. Hogsett, and D. T. Tingey. 1994. Attainment and effects issues regarding alternative secondary ozone air quality standards. Journal of Environmental Quality 23(6):1129-1140.
14. Lefohn, A. S., and A. A. Lucier. 1991. Spatial and temporal variability of ozone exposure in forested areas of the USA and Canada. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 41:694-701.
15. Lefohn, A. S., H. P. Knudsen, J. A. Logan, J. Simpson, and C. Bhumralkar. 1987. An evaluation of the kriging method to predict 7-h seasonal mean ozone concentrations for estimating crop losses. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 37:595-602.
16. Lefohn, A. S., D. S. Shadwick, M. C. Somerville, A. H. Chappelka, B. G. Lockaby, and R. S. Meldahl. 1992. The characterization and comparison of ozone exposure indices used in assessing the response of loblolly pine to ozone. Atmospheric Environment 26A:287-298.
17. Little, E. L., Jr. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146. US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Washington, DC.
18. Logan, J. A. 1988. The ozone problem in rural areas of the United States. Pages 327-344 in I. S. A. Isaksen (ed.), Tropospheric ozone. D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht.
19. Loveland, T. R., J. W. Merchant, D. O. Ohlen, and J. F. Brown. 1991. Development of a land-cover characteristics database lor the conterminous US. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing 75(11):1453-1463.
20. Miller, P. R., S. R. McBride, S. L. Schilling, and A. P. Gomez. 1989. Trend of ozone damage to conifer forests between 1974 and 1988 in the San Bernardino Mountains of Southern California. Pages 309-324 in R. K. Olson and A. S. Lefohn (eds.), Effect of air pollution on western forests. Transactions Series. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburg.
21. Musselman, R. C., P. M. McCool, and A. S. Lefohn. 1994. Ozone descriptors for an air quality standard to protect vegetation. Journal of Air and Waste Management 44:1383-1390.
22. National Research Council. 1991. Rethinking the ozone problem in urban and regional air pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 489 pp.
23. Neufeld, H. S., E. H. Lee, J. R. Renfro, W. D. Hacker, and B.-H. Yu. 1995. Sensitivity of seedlings of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) to ozone in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 1. Exposure-response curves for biomass. New Phytologist 130:447-459.
24. Oliver, M. A. 1990. Kriging: A method for interpolation for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 4:313-332.
25. Pinkerton, J. E., and A. S. Lefohn. 1987. The characterization of ozone data for sites located in forested areas of the eastern United States. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 37:1005-1010.
26. Pye, J. M. 1988. Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 17:347-360.
27. Qiu, Z., A. H. Chappelka, G. L. Somers, B. G. Lockaby, and R. S. Meldahl. 1992. Effects of ozone and simulated acidic precipitation on above- and below-ground growth of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:582-587.
28. Rawlings, J. O., and W. W. Cure. 1985. The Weibull function as a dose-response model to describe ozone effects on crop yields. Crop Science 25:807-814.
29. Reich, P. B., and R. G. Amundson. 1985. Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230:566-570.
30. Roose, M. L. 1991. Genetics of response to atmospheric pollutants. Pages 111-126 in G. E. Taylor, L. F. Pitelka, and M. T. Clegg (eds.), Ecological genetics and air pollution. Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. Schafer, S. R., and A. S. Heagle. 1989. Growth responses of field-grown loblolly pine to chronic doses of ozone during multiple growing seasons. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:821-831.
32. Suter, G. W. 1990. End points for regional ecological risk assessments. Environmental Management 14:9-23.
33. Tingey, D. T., W. E. Hogsett, and S. Henderson. 1990. Definition of adverse effects for the purpose of establishing secondard national ambient air quality standards. Journal of Environmental Quality 19:635-639.
34. Tingey, D. T., W. E. Hogsett, E. H. Lee, A. A. Herstrom, and S. H. Azevedo. 1991. An evaluation of variou alternative ambient ozone standards based on crop yield loss data. Pages 272-288 in R. L. Berglund, D. R. Lawson and D. J. McKee (eds.), Transactions: Tropospheric ozone and the environment. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh.
35. Urban, D. L. 1990. A versatile model to simulate forest pattern. A user's guide to ZELIG version 1.0. Environmental Sciences Department, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
36. US Department of Commerce. 1992. 1990 Census of population and housing summary tape file 1C. Bureau of Census, Data User Services Division, Washington, DC.
37. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1986. Air quality criteria for ozone and other photochemical oxidants, Vol III. EPA-600/8-84-020cF. Washington, DC.
38. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1992a. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. Washington, DC.
39. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1992b. National air pollutant emissions estimates, 1900-1991. EPA-454/ R-92-013. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
40. Watson, D. F., and C. M. Phillip. 1985. A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation. Geo-Processing 2:315-327.
41. Weinstein, D. A., R. M. Beloin, and R. D. Yanai. 1991. Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stresses. Tree Physiology 9:127-146.
42. Wolff, G. T., P. J. Lioy, and R. S. Taylor. 1987. The diurnal variations of ozone at different altitudes on a rural mountain in the eastern United States. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 37:45-18.
43. Woudenberg, S. W., and T. O. Farrenkopf. 1995. The Westwide forest inventory data base: User's manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-317. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, 67 pp.