Kinetic dialogs in predator-prey recognition

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 113-120

  Levin, Luis E ^a  

^a FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Approach withdrawal; Behavioural decisions; Behavioural games; Probe movements; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FISH; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PREDATOR; PROBABILITY; ROBOTICS;

ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOUR; PREDATOR-PREY RECOGNITION; ZEBRAFISH;

BRACHYDANIO RERIO;

EID: 0030613561     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00777-8     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abrams, P.A., 1986. Is predator-prey evolution an arms race? Trends Ecol. Evol. Rep. 1: 108-110.
2. Blest, A.D., 1957. The function of eye-spots patterns in the Lepidoptera. Behaviour 11: 209-256.
3. Bronstein, J.L., 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Tree 9: 214-217.
4. Burghardt, G.M. and Green, H.W., 1988. Predator simulation and duration of death feigning in neonate hognose snakes. Anim. Behav. 36: 1842-1844.
5. Chance, M.R. and Russell, W.M.S., 1959. Protean displays: A form of allaesthetic behavior. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 132: 65-70.
6. Cott, H.B., 1940. Adaptive coloration in Animals. Methuen, London.
7. Coates, D., 1980. The discrimination of and reaction towards predatory and non-predatory species of fish by humbug damsel fish Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces, Pomacentridae) Z. Tierpsychol. 52: 347-354.
8. Curio, E., 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer, Berlin.
9. Czanyi, V., 1985. Ethological analysis of predator avoidance by the paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis). I. Recognition and learning of predators. Behaviour 92: 227-240.
10. Dawkins, R. and Krebs, J.R., 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. London B 205: 489-511.
11. Deshmukh, I., 1986. Ecology and tropical biology. Blackwell, Oxford.
12. Edmunds, M., 1974. Defence in animals. Longman, Harlow.
13. Eklöv, P., 1992) Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Anim. Behav., 44: 313-326.
14. Frings, H. and Frings, M., 1964. Animal communication. Blaisdell, New York.
15. Galbraith, M.G. Jr., 1967. Size-selective predation on Daphnia by rainbow trout, and yellow perch. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 96: 1-10.
16. Gallup, G.G., JR., Nash, R.F., Donegan, N.H. and McClur, M.K., 1971. The immobility response: A predator-induced reaction in chickens. Psychol. Rec. 21: 513-519.
17. Gallup, G.G., 1973. Simulated predation and tonic immobility in Anolis carolinensis. Copeia 3: 623-624
18. Gerlai. R., 1993. Can paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis, Anabantidae) recognize a natural predator? An ethologiacal analysis. Ethology 4: 127-136.
19. Helfman, G.S., 1986. Behavioral responses of prey fishes during predator prey interactions. In: P. Feder, M.E. and G.V. Lauder (Editors), Predator-prey relationships. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Chap.9, pp. 135-156.
20. Hennessy, D.F., 1986, On the deadly risk of predator harassment. Ethology 72, 72-74.
21. Howland, H.C., 1974. Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: The relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability. J. Theor. Biol. 47: 333-350.
22. Huntingford, F.A. and Coulter, R.M., 1989. Habituation of predator inspection in the three-spined stickelback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J. Fish Biol. 35: 153-154.
23. Jones, R.B., 1980. Reactions of male domestic chicks to two-dimensional eye-like shapes. Anim. Behav. 28: 212-218.
24. Kanou, M. and Shimozawa, T., 1983. The elicitation of the predatory labial strike of dragonfly larvae in response to a purely mechanical stimulus. J. Exp. Biol. 107: 391-404.
25. Kiltie, R.A. and Laine, A.F., 1992. Visual textures, machine vision and camouflage. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 163-166.
26. Krebs, J.R. and Davis, N.B., 1981. An introduction to Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford.
27. Levine, J.S. Lobel, P.S. and Macnichol, E.F., 1980. Visual communication in fishes. In: M.A. Ali (Editor), Environmental Physiology of fishes. Plenum, New York.
28. Levin, L.E. and Belmonte, P., 1988. Oriented swimming at an angle to light in a schooling characid Moenkhausia dichroura Kner. J. Fish Biol. 32: 69-177.
29. Lima, S.L. and Dill, L.M., 1990. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
30. Magurran, A.E., 1990. The inheritance and development of minnow antipredator behaviour. Anim. Behav. 39: 834-842.
31. Magurran, A.E. and Girling, S.L., 1986. Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Anim. Behav. 34: 510-5518.
32. Marler, P., 1977. The Evolution of Communication. In: Sebeok, T.A. (Editor), How Animals Communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
33. Milinski, L. Kulling, D. and Kettler, R., 1990. Tit for tat: sticklebacks 'trusting' a cooperating partner. Behav. Ecol. 1: 7-11.
34. Pianka, E.R,. 1978. Evolutionary Ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
35. Pitcher, T., Green, D. and Magurran, A.E,. 1986. Dicing with death: predator inspection behavior. J. Fish Biol. 28: 1439-1448.
36. Poiani, A. and Yorke, M. 1989. Predator harassment: More evidence on the deadly risk. Ethology 83: 167-169.
37. Roth, G., 1986. Neural Mechanisms of prey recognition, an example in amphibians. In: M.E. Feder and G.V. Lauder (Editors), Predator-prey relationships. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 42-68.
38. Sargent, T.D., 1981. Antipredator adaptations of underwing moths. In: A.C. Kamil and T.D. Sargent (Editors), Foraging Behaviour: Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches. Garland STPM Press, New York.
39. Schlenoff, D.H., 1985. The startle response of blue jays to Catocala (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) prey models. Anim. Behav. 33: 1057-1067.
40. Schoenfeld, W.N., Cole, B.K., Lang, J. and Mankoff R., 1973. Contingency in Behavior Theory. In: F.J. McGuigan and D.B. Lumsden (Editors), Contemporary Approaches to Conditioning and Learning, V.W. Winston, New York,pp. 151-171.
41. Shilds, W.M., 1984. Barn swallow mobbing: self-defence, collateral kin defence, group defence, or parental care? Anim. Behav. 32: 132-148.
42. Sih, A., 1984. Optimal behavior and density-dependent predation. Am. Nat. 123: 314-326.
43. Skelly, D.K., 1994. Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Anim. Behav. 47: 465-468.
44. Tavolga, W.N., 1970. Levels of interaction in animal communication. In: L.R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D.S. Lehrman and J.S. Rosenblatt (Editors), Development and evolution of behavior. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
45. Tulley, J.J. and Huntingford, F.A., 1987. Age, experience and the development of adaptive variation in antipredator responses in three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Ethology 75: 285-290.
46. Uiblein, F., Durand, J.P., Juberthie, C. and Parzefall, J., 1992. Predation in caves: The effects of prey immobility and darkness on the foraging behaviour of two salamanders, Euproctus asper and Proteus anguinus. Behav. Proc. 28: 33-40.
47. Weighs, D., 1975. Energetic advantages of burst swimming of fish. J. Theor. Biol. 48: 215-229.
48. Webb, P.W., 1984. Chase response latencies of some teleostean piscivores. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 79A: 45-48.
49. Welch, C. and Colgan, P., 1990. The effects of contrast and position on habituation to models of predators in eastern banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus). Behav. Proc. 22: 61-71.
50. Wolf, F.A., 1981. Taking the quantum leap. Harper and Row, San Francisco.
51. Zahavi, A. 1987. The theory of signal selection and some of its implications. In: V.P. Delfino (Editor), International Symposium of Biological Evolution, pp. 305-327. Adriatica Editrice Bari.