Sound quality judgement during acclimatization of hearing aid

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-51

  Ovegård, Anders ^a,d   Lundberg, Göran ^a   Hagerman, Björn ^a   Gabrielsson, Alf ^c   Bengtsson, Monica ^b   Brändström, Ulrika ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hearing aid fitting; Sound quality judgement

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATIZATION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MUSIC; NOISE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; SPEECH; DECISION MAKING; FOLLOW UP; PROSTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030609906     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01050399709074974     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bentler RA, Neibuhr DP, Getta JP, Anderson CV. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993a; 36: 808-19.
2. Bentler RA, Neibuhr, DP, Getta JP, Anderson CV. Long-itudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993b; 36: 820-31.
3. Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL). New procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257-65.
4. Eriksson-Mangold M, Ringdahl A, Björklund AK, Wåhlin B. The active fitting (AF) programme of hearing aids: a psychological perspective. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 277-85.
5. Gabrielsson A. Dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. Scand J Psychol 1979; 20: 159-69.
6. Gabrielsson A, Lindström B. Perceived sound quality of high-fidelity loudspeakers. J Audio Eng 1985; 33: 33-53.
7. Gabrielsson A, Schenkman B, Hagerman B. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgements and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 166-77.
8. Gabrielsson A, Hagerman B, Bech-Kristensen T, Lundberg G. Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1359-65.
9. Gatehouse S. The timecourse and magnitude of perceptual acclimatisation to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 3: 1258-68.
10. Gatehouse S. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 295-306.
11. Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 57-63.
12. Jerlvall L, Almqvist B, Ovegård A, Arlinger S. Clinical trial of in-the-ear hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 63-70.
13. Lundberg G, Ovegård A, Hagerman B, Gabrielsson A, Brändström, U. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and close earmould equalized in frequency response. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 87-92.
14. Ovegård A, Ramström AB. Individual follow-up of hearing aid fitting. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 57-63.
15. SAME 1983. Metodbok i praktisk hörselmätning. LIC förlag, Solna. English edn. Manual of Practical Audiometry, Vol. 1, ed. Stig Arlinger. London: Whurr Publisher Ltd, 1989.