Effects of interdose interval on ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine, cocaine and morphine in mice

European Journal of Pharmacology

Volumn 316, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-5

  Kuribara, Hisashi ^a  

^a GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ambulatory sensitization; Cocaine; Interdose interval; Methamphetamine; Morphine; Mouse

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; COCAINE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MORPHINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG TOLERANCE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MORPHINE TOLERANCE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COCAINE; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MORPHINE; NARCOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 0030605205     PISSN: 00142999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(96)00635-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chaudry, I.A., S.A. Turkanis and R. Karler, 1985, Characteristics of 'reverse tolerance' to amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation in mice, Neuropharmacology 27, 777.
2. Connell, P.H., 1968, The use and abuse of amphetamines, Practitioner 200, 234.
3. Demellweek, C. and A.J. Goudie, 1983, Behavioural tolerance to amphetamine and other psychostimulants: the case for considering behavioral mechanisms, Psychopharmacology 80, 287.
4. Ellinwood Jr., E.H., 1968, Amphetamine psychosis. II. Theoretical implications, Int. J. Neuropsychiatry 4, 45.
5. Hirabayashi, M. and M.R. Alam, 1981, Enhancing effect of methamphetamine on ambulatory activity produced by repeated administration in mice, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15, 925.
6. Hirabayashi, M., S. Okada and S. Tadokoro, 1991, Comparison of sensitization to ambulation-increasing effects of cocaine and methamphetamine after repeated administration in mice, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 43, 827.
7. Iizuka, M. and M. Hirabayashi, 1983, Enhancing effect of morphine on ambulatory activity produced by repeated administration in mice, Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi 82, 293.
8. Kalivas, P.W. and J. Stewart, 1991, Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity, Brain Res. Rev. 16, 223.
9. Kaneto, H., M. Moida, H. Nakanishi and H. Samano. 1973, A scoring system for abstinence syndrome in morphine dependent mice and application to evaluate morphine type dependence liability of drugs, Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 23, 701.
10. Kokkinidis, L. and H. Anisman, 1980, Amphetamine models of amphetamine paranoid schizophrenia: an overview and elaboration of animal experimentation, Psychol. Bull. 88, 551.
11. Kuribara, H., 1995, Modification of morphine sensitization by opioid and dopamine receptor antagonists: evaluation by studying ambulation in mice, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 275, 251.
12. Kuribara, H. and M. Hirabayashi, 1985, Reverse tolerance to psychotropic drugs, Shinkei Seishin Yakuri 7, 421.
13. 2 agonist: factors determining behavioral tolerance and sensitization, Psychopharmacology 95, 534.
14. Nelson, L.R. and G. Ellison, 1978, Enhanced stereotypies after repeated injections but not continuous amphetamines, Neuropharmacology 17, 1081.
15. Pert, A., R. Post and R.B. Wiss, 1990, Conditioning as a critical determinant of sensitization induced by psychomotor stimulants, NIDA Res. Monogr. 97, 208.
16. Piazza, P.V., J.M. Deminière, M. LeMoal and H. Simon H, 1989, Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration, Science 245, 1511.
17. Post, R.M., 1980, Intermittent versus continuous stimulation: effect of time interval on the development of sensitization or tolerance, Life Sci. 26, 1275.
18. Robinson, T. and J.B. Becker, 1986, Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis, Brain Res. Rev. 11, 157.
19. Segal, D.S. and M.A. Schuckit, 1983, Animal models of stimulant induced psychosis, in: Stimulants: Neurochemical, Behavioral and Clinical Perspectives, ed. I. Creese (Raven Press, New York, NY) p. 121.
20. Tadokoro, S. and H. Kuribara, 1986, Reverse tolerance to the ambulation-increasing effect of methamphetamine in mice as an animal model of amphetamine psychosis, Psychopharmacol. Bull. 22, 757.
21. Tadokoro, S. and H. Kuribara, 1990, Modification of behavioral effects of drugs after repeated administration; in particular, the reverse tolerance to amphetamines, Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi 95, 229.
22. Vezina, P. and J. Stewart, 1984, Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 20, 925.
23. Wise, R.A. and M.A. Bozarth, 1987, A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction, Psychol. Rev. 94, 469.