The covalently bound N3O2 molecule: Two possible isomers

Chemical Physics Letters

Volumn 253, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 196-200

  Pápai, Imre ^a   Stirling, András ^a  

^a Institute of Isotopes   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030602521     PISSN: 00092614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00227-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. [1] S.H. Linn and C.Y. Ng, J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 4921.
2. [2] A.J. Illies, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 2889.
3. [3] S.R. Desai, C.S. Feigerle and J.C. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 4526.
4. [4] J.V. Coe, J.T. Snodgrass, C.B. Freidhoff, K.M. McHugh and K.H. Bowen, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 4302.
5. [5] K. Hiraoka, S. Fujimaki, K. Aruga and S. Yamabe, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 8295.
6. 2O is estimated to be 7.7 kcal/mol (see Ref. [2]).
7. [7] A. Stirling, I. Pápai, J. Mink and D.R. Salahub, J. Chem. Phys. 100 (1994) 2910.
8. [8] J.C. Slater, Quantum theory of molecules and solids, Vol. 4: The self-consistent field for molecules and solids (McGrawHill, New York, 1974).
9. [9] S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58 (1980) 1200.
10. [10] A.D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988) 3098.
11. [11] J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 33 (1986) 8822; erratum in Phys. Rev. B 38 (1986) 7406.
12. [12] C. Lee, W. Yang and R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785.
13. [13] A. St-Amant, Ph.D. thesis (Université de Montréal, 1991).
14. [14] A. St-Amant and D.R. Salahub, Chem. Phys. Letters 169 (1990) 387.
15. [15] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, P.M.W. Gill, B.G. Johnson, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G.A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M.A. Al-Laham, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.V. Ortiz, J.B. Foresman, C.Y. Peng, P.Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, E.S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, J.S. Binkley, D.J. Defrees, J. Baker, J.J.P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez and J.A. Pople, Gaussian 94 (Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1995).
16. 2 calculations. In deMon the electron density and the exchange-correlation potential are fitted using auxiliary sets of Gaussian functions, while in Gaussian94/DFT no such an expansion is employed. Also, the integration grids are different in the two implementations.
17. [17] C.H. Bibart and G.E. Ewig, J. Chem. Phys. 61 (1974) 1284.
18. [18] R.D. Harcourt and F.L. Skrezenek, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 7007.
19. [19] R. Liu and X. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 4413.