|
|
|
Volumn 214, Issue 26, 1996, Pages 28-31
|
|
What right to die?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
ATTITUDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
POLICY;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
PRIVACY;
PUBLIC OPINION;
QUILL V. VACCO;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ATTITUDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
NEW YORK;
PRIVACY;
PUBLIC OPINION;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WASHINGTON;
|
|
EID: 0030599998
PISSN: 00286583
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
