|
|
|
Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 28-29
|
|
Rush to a lethal judgment: the case against doctor-assisted suicide.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
CONSUMER;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FREEDOM;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
POLICY;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SUICIDE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSUMER PARTICIPATION;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FREEDOM;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIANS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SUICIDE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030596550
PISSN: 00287822
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (4)
|
|
References (0)
|
