-
1
-
-
0003482930
-
-
Brackei A & P. Glasgow
-
1. Buckingham, A. D.; Legon, A. C.; Roberts, S. M. Principles of Molecular Recognition; Brackei A & P. Glasgow, 1993. Dugas, H. Bioorganic Chemistry; Springer New York, 1996. Lehn, J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 89.
-
(1993)
Principles of Molecular Recognition
-
-
Buckingham, A.D.1
Legon, A.C.2
Roberts, S.M.3
-
2
-
-
0003719912
-
-
Springer New York
-
1. Buckingham, A. D.; Legon, A. C.; Roberts, S. M. Principles of Molecular Recognition; Brackei A & P. Glasgow, 1993. Dugas, H. Bioorganic Chemistry; Springer New York, 1996. Lehn, J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 89.
-
(1996)
Bioorganic Chemistry
-
-
Dugas, H.1
-
3
-
-
84985574355
-
-
1. Buckingham, A. D.; Legon, A. C.; Roberts, S. M. Principles of Molecular Recognition; Brackei A & P. Glasgow, 1993. Dugas, H. Bioorganic Chemistry; Springer New York, 1996. Lehn, J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 89.
-
(1988)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.27
, pp. 89
-
-
Lehn, J.M.1
-
4
-
-
0000087389
-
-
2. Rebek, Jr. J.; Askew, B.; Ballester, P.; Buhr, C.; Jones, S.; Nemeth, D.; Williams, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 5033.
-
(1987)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.109
, pp. 5033
-
-
Rebek J., Jr.1
Askew, B.2
Ballester, P.3
Buhr, C.4
Jones, S.5
Nemeth, D.6
Williams, K.7
-
7
-
-
0021891866
-
-
5. Cimino, G. D.; Gamper, H. B.; Isaacs, S. T.; Hearst, J. E. Ann. Rev. Biochem., 1985, 54, 1151.
-
(1985)
Ann. Rev. Biochem.
, vol.54
, pp. 1151
-
-
Cimino, G.D.1
Gamper, H.B.2
Isaacs, S.T.3
Hearst, J.E.4
-
8
-
-
0018731020
-
-
6. Shim, S. C.; Chae, S. C. Photochem. Photobiol., 1979, 30, 349. Kanne, S. C.; Straub, K.; Hearst, J. E.; Rapoport, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104. 6754. Shim, S. C.; Kim, Y. Z. Photochem. Photobiol., 1983, 38,265. Miolo, G.; Lucchini, V.; Rodighiero, P.; Dall'Acqua, R.; Caffieri, S. Photochem. Photobiol., 1994, 59, 277
-
(1979)
Photochem. Photobiol.
, vol.30
, pp. 349
-
-
Shim, S.C.1
Chae, S.C.2
-
9
-
-
0020404028
-
-
6. Shim, S. C.; Chae, S. C. Photochem. Photobiol., 1979, 30, 349. Kanne, S. C.; Straub, K.; Hearst, J. E.; Rapoport, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104. 6754. Shim, S. C.; Kim, Y. Z. Photochem. Photobiol., 1983, 38,265. Miolo, G.; Lucchini, V.; Rodighiero, P.; Dall'Acqua, R.; Caffieri, S. Photochem. Photobiol., 1994, 59, 277
-
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.104
, pp. 6754
-
-
Kanne, S.C.1
Straub, K.2
Hearst, J.E.3
Rapoport, H.4
-
10
-
-
0020827515
-
-
6. Shim, S. C.; Chae, S. C. Photochem. Photobiol., 1979, 30, 349. Kanne, S. C.; Straub, K.; Hearst, J. E.; Rapoport, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104. 6754. Shim, S. C.; Kim, Y. Z. Photochem. Photobiol., 1983, 38,265. Miolo, G.; Lucchini, V.; Rodighiero, P.; Dall'Acqua, R.; Caffieri, S. Photochem. Photobiol., 1994, 59, 277
-
(1983)
Photochem. Photobiol.
, vol.38
, pp. 265
-
-
Shim, S.C.1
Kim, Y.Z.2
-
11
-
-
0028384715
-
-
6. Shim, S. C.; Chae, S. C. Photochem. Photobiol., 1979, 30, 349. Kanne, S. C.; Straub, K.; Hearst, J. E.; Rapoport, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104. 6754. Shim, S. C.; Kim, Y. Z. Photochem. Photobiol., 1983, 38,265. Miolo, G.; Lucchini, V.; Rodighiero, P.; Dall'Acqua, R.; Caffieri, S. Photochem. Photobiol., 1994, 59, 277
-
(1994)
Photochem. Photobiol.
, vol.59
, pp. 277
-
-
Miolo, G.1
Lucchini, V.2
Rodighiero, P.3
Dall'Acqua, R.4
Caffieri, S.5
-
12
-
-
85136559574
-
-
note
-
-1 for the anti complexes, respectively.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
85136567361
-
-
note
-
1H NMR spectra.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0011863241
-
-
note
-
6; C, 65.79; H, 5.52; N, 3.65, Found; C, 65.72; H, 5.49; N, 3.62.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0011897829
-
-
note
-
8; C, 63.69; H, 6.24; N, 7.43, Found; C, 63.51; H, 6.19; N, 7.12.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0011902051
-
-
note
-
8; C, 63.69; H, 6.24; N, 7.43, Found; C, 63.71; H, 6.41; N, 7.28.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0011906972
-
-
note
-
6; C, 62.17; H, 5.74; N, 7.25, Found; C, 62.22; H, 5.69; N, 7.20.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
85136576494
-
-
note
-
2O (44 : 56 →32 : 68, 15 min), detection at 240 nm for 4 ,5 and 6 or 360 nm for 1 and 2. The compounds were separated and quantitatively determined by HPLC under these conditions.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
0011829661
-
-
Benzene as solvent would be preferable for hydrogen bonding formation to acetonitrile due to its small dielectric constant
-
11. Benzene as solvent would be preferable for hydrogen bonding formation to acetonitrile due to its small dielectric constant.
-
-
-
|