Asymmetric solute transport and solvent flux in dual-skinned hollow fiber membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 199-212

  Soltys, Paul J ^a   Ofsthun, Norma J ^a   Zydney, Andrew L ^b  

^a BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b University of Delaware   (United States)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization; Fiber membranes; Membrane preparation and structure; Osmotic pressure; Sieving coefficient; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

DEXTRAN; POLYETHER; POLYSULFONE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FLOW OF FLUIDS; POROUS MATERIALS; SOLVENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ASYMMETRIC SOLUTE TRANSPORT; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DIRECTIONAL SELECTIVITY; DUAL SKINNED HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANES; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; SIEVING COEFFICIENT; SOLVENT FLUX;

FIBROUS MEMBRANES;

MEMBRANES-FLUX; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0030592208     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00089-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. [1] N.J. Ofsthun and J.K. Leypoldt, Ultrafiltration and backfiltration during hemodialysis, Artif. Organs, 19 (1995) 1143.
2. [2] P.F. Curran, Na, Cl, and water transport by rat ileum in vitro, J. Gen. Physiol., 43 (1960) 1137.
3. [3] R.P. Durbin, Osmotic flow of water across permeable cellulose membranes, J. Gen. Physiol., 44 (1960) 315.
4. [4] A. Katchalsky and O. Kedem, Thermodynamics of flow processes in biological systems, Biophys. J., 2 (1962) 53.
5. [5] C.S. Patlak, D.A. Goldstein and J.F. Hoffman, The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system, J. Theoret. Biol., 5 (1963) 426.
6. [6] G. Jonsson, The influence of the porous sublayer on the salt rejection and reflection coefficient of asymmetric CA membranes, Desalination, 34 (1980) 141.
7. [7] G. Jonsson, Concentration profiles and retention-flux curves for composite membranes in reverse osmosis, J. Membrane Sci., 14 (1983) 211.
8. [8] W.M. Deen, Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores, AIChE J., 33 (1987) 1409.
9. [9] S. Mochizuki and A.L. Zydney, Dextran transport through asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes: Comparison with hydrodynamic models, J. Membrane Sci., 68 (1992) 21.
10. [10] M. Mulder, Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.
11. [11] R.P. Frigon, J.K. Leypoldt, S. Uyeji and L.W. Henderson, Disparity between stokes radii of dextrans and proteins as determined by retention volume in gel permeation chromatography, Anal. Chem., 55 (1983) 1349.
12. [12] W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michaels and L. Nelson, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration. Causes, consequences, and control techniques, in J.E. Flinn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, 1970, p. 47.
13. [13] J.M. Piret and C.L. Cooney, Mammalian cell and protein distributions in ultrafiltration hollow fiber bioreactors, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 36 (1990) 902.
14. [14] P.M. Bungay and H. Brenner, The motion of a closely-fitting sphere in a fluid-filled tube, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1 (1973) 25.
15. [15] L.J. Langsdorf and A.L. Zydney, Diffusive and convective transport through hemodialysis membranes: Comparison with hydrodynamic predictions, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 28 (1994) 573.
16. [16] K.A. Granath, Solution properties of branched dextrans. J. Colloid Sci., 13 (1958) 308.
17. [17] D. R. Boggs, Diffusive Transport in Membranes for Immunoisolation, Ph.D. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University, 1994, 175.